The Effect of Automated Taxa Identification Errors on Biological Indices
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In benthic macroinvertebrate biomonitoring systems, the target is to determine the status of ecosystems based on several biological indices. To increase cost-efficiency, computer-based taxa identification for image data has recently been developed. Taxa identification errors can, however, have strong effects on the indices and thus on the determination of the ecological status. In order to shift the biomonitoring process towards automated expert systems, we need a clear understanding on the bias caused by automation. In this paper, we examine eleven classification methods in the case of macroinvertebrate image data and show how their classification errors propagate into different biological indices. We evaluate 14 richness, diversity, dominance and similarity indices commonly used in biomonitoring. Besides the error rate of the classification method, we discuss the potential effect of different types of identification errors. Finally, we provide recommendations on indices that are least affected by the automatic identification errors and could be used in automated biomonitoring. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Biomonitoring, Classification error, Diversity: error propagation, Identification, Similarity, Percent Model Affinity, Citizen-Science, Classification, Diversity, Misclassification, Dimensionality, Identification, ta112, Classification error, Statistics, Similarity, samanlaisuus, diversity: error propagation, Diversity: error propagation, Biomonitoring, biomonitoring, identification, classification error, error propagation [Diversity], Tilastotiede, ta218
Fields of Science
0106 biological sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
6
Source
Expert Systems Wıth Applıcatıons
Volume
72
Issue
Start Page
108
End Page
120
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 26
SCOPUS™ Citations
5
checked on Mar 23, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
5
checked on Mar 23, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Mar 23, 2026
Downloads
23
checked on Mar 23, 2026
Google Scholar™


