Assessing the Effectiveness of Acs Surgical Risk Calculator Versus P-Possum in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity for Major Hepatobiliary Surgery: an Observational Study

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Lippincott williams & wilkins

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Risk assessment is difficult yet would provide valuable data for both the surgeons and the patients in major hepatobiliary surgeries. An ideal risk calculator should improve workflow through efficient, timely, and accurate risk stratification. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) and Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) are surgical risk stratification tools used to assess postoperative morbidity. In this study, preoperative data from 300 patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgeries performed at a single tertiary university hospital were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and entered into the ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM systems, and the resulting risk scores were calculated and recorded accordingly. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.725) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.791) models showed better morbidity discrimination ability than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.672) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.806) model showed better differentiation success in morbidity than other models. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.888) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.956) models showed better mortality discrimination than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.776) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.948) model showed better mortality differentiation success than the ACS-NSQIP-M1 and P-POSSUM-M1 models. The use of ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM calculators for major hepatobiliary surgeries offers quantitative data to assess risks for both the surgeon and the patient. Integrating these calculators into preoperative evaluation practices can enhance decision-making processes for patients. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the P-POSSUM-M2 model for morbidity and the ACS-NSQIP-M2 model for mortality exhibited superior overall performance.

Description

Keywords

ACS score, hepatobiliary surgery, P-POSSUM score, surgical risk calculator, Resections, Whipple, Male, Adult, 7100, Middle Aged, hepatobiliary surgery, Risk Assessment, Quality Improvement, P-POSSUM score, Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, surgical risk calculator, Humans, Female, ACS score, Retrospective Studies, Aged

Fields of Science

03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Medicine

Volume

103

Issue

28

Start Page

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 3

PubMed : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 9

SCOPUS™ Citations

3

checked on Mar 20, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

2

checked on Mar 20, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Mar 20, 2026

Downloads

12

checked on Mar 20, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.082

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.