Assessing the Effectiveness of Acs Surgical Risk Calculator Versus P-Possum in Predicting Mortality and Morbidity for Major Hepatobiliary Surgery: an Observational Study
Loading...
Files
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Lippincott williams & wilkins
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Risk assessment is difficult yet would provide valuable data for both the surgeons and the patients in major hepatobiliary surgeries. An ideal risk calculator should improve workflow through efficient, timely, and accurate risk stratification. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) and Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) are surgical risk stratification tools used to assess postoperative morbidity. In this study, preoperative data from 300 patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgeries performed at a single tertiary university hospital were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and entered into the ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM systems, and the resulting risk scores were calculated and recorded accordingly. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.725) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.791) models showed better morbidity discrimination ability than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.672) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.806) model showed better differentiation success in morbidity than other models. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.888) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.956) models showed better mortality discrimination than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.776) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.948) model showed better mortality differentiation success than the ACS-NSQIP-M1 and P-POSSUM-M1 models. The use of ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM calculators for major hepatobiliary surgeries offers quantitative data to assess risks for both the surgeon and the patient. Integrating these calculators into preoperative evaluation practices can enhance decision-making processes for patients. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the P-POSSUM-M2 model for morbidity and the ACS-NSQIP-M2 model for mortality exhibited superior overall performance.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
ACS score, hepatobiliary surgery, P-POSSUM score, surgical risk calculator, Resections, Whipple, Male, Adult, 7100, Middle Aged, hepatobiliary surgery, Risk Assessment, Quality Improvement, P-POSSUM score, Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications, surgical risk calculator, Humans, Female, ACS score, Retrospective Studies, Aged
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Medicine
Volume
103
Issue
28
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 9
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Mar 20, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
2
checked on Mar 20, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Mar 20, 2026
Downloads
12
checked on Mar 20, 2026
Google Scholar™


