Avoiding Change Orders in Public School Construction
Loading...
Files
Date
2007-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Asce-Amer Soc Civil Engineers
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Increased student enrollment and the current poor state of the educational infrastructure require the construction of more school buildings and the renovation of many of the existing ones. The large number and magnitude of change orders in these projects constitute an impediment to the rapid and economic delivery of these projects. A total of 6,585 change orders filed in a school district's projects in the 5 1/2 year period from 1999 to 2004 were analyzed in five categories including owner-directed changes, code compliance issues, errors/omissions in contract documents, discovered or changed conditions, and others. The results of the study indicate that the dollar value of change orders relative to the original contract can be reduced if preventive measures are taken. These measures include choosing the right construction management firm, emphasizing the definition of project scope early in the project, and effectively managing the precontract activities by conducting value engineering and constructability reviews. The results indicate that school projects can be completed with change orders not exceeding 5% of the contract value if these measures are taken. This study is of relevance to practitioners involved in school design and construction projects.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
change orders, schools, construction management, Mechanical Construction, Labor Efficiency, Impact, Projects
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
36
Source
Journal of Professıonal Issues in Engıneerıng Educatıon And Practıce
Volume
133
Issue
1
Start Page
67
End Page
73
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 26
Scopus : 40
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 70
Google Scholar™


