Robust R-Peak Detection in Low-Quality Holter Ecgs Using 1d Convolutional Neural Network
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Objective: Noise and low quality of ECG signals acquired from Holter or wearable devices deteriorate the accuracy and robustness of R-peak detection algorithms. This paper presents a generic and robust system for R-peak detection in Holter ECG signals. While many proposed algorithms have successfully addressed the problem of ECG R-peak detection, there is still a notable gap in the performance of these detectors on such low-quality ECG records. Methods: In this study, a novel implementation of the 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is used integrated with a verification model to reduce the number of false alarms. This CNN architecture consists of an encoder block and a corresponding decoder block followed by a sample-wise classification layer to construct the 1D segmentation map of R-peaks from the input ECG signal. Once the proposed model has been trained, it can solely be used to detect R-peaks possibly in a single channel ECG data stream quickly and accurately, or alternatively, such a solution can be conveniently employed for real-time monitoring on a lightweight portable device. Results: The model is tested on two open-access ECG databases: The China Physiological Signal Challenge (2020) database (CPSC-DB) with more than one million beats, and the commonly used MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database (MIT-DB). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed systematic approach achieves 99.30% F1-score, 99.69% recall, and 98.91% precision in CPSC-DB, which is the best R-peak detection performance ever achieved. Results also demonstrate similar or better performance than most competing algorithms on MIT-DB with 99.83% F1-score, 99.85% recall, and 99.82% precision. Significance: Compared to all competing methods, the proposed approach can reduce the false-positives and false-negatives in Holter ECG signals by more than 54% and 82%, respectively. Conclusion: Finally, the simple and invariant nature of the parameters leads to a highly generic system and therefore applicable to any ECG dataset.
Description
Keywords
Electrocardiography, Sensitivity, Performance evaluation, Monitoring, Benchmark testing, Noise measurement, Electronic mail, 1D convolutional neural network, R-peak detection, ECG monitoring, holter registers, Qrs, Classification, Transform, Ann, Segmentation map, Signal Processing (eess.SP), FOS: Computer and information sciences, ambulatory electrocardiography, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Single channel ECG, electrocardiography, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Number of false alarms, Biomedical signal processing, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 610, heart arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Physiological signals, 213, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Computer, Electrocardiography, Computer-Assisted, Ambulatory, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Humans, human, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Signal Processing, signal processing, algorithm, 213 Electronic, automation and communications engineering, electronics, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Physiological models, Convolution, Verification model, Wearable devices, 004, Competing algorithms, Database systems, Real time monitoring, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Convolutional neural networks, Neural Networks, Computer, Cardiac, Algorithms, Data streams
Fields of Science
0206 medical engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
51
Source
Ieee Transactıons on Bıomedıcal Engıneerıng
Volume
69
Issue
1
Start Page
119
End Page
128
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 35
Scopus : 75
PubMed : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 104
SCOPUS™ Citations
75
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
54
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Downloads
7
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Google Scholar™


