Examining the Use of Abdominal Compression in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Liver Metastases - a Single Center's Experience of 10 Years
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Termedia Publishing House Ltd
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with abdominal compression (AC) stands out due to the high tolerance and ease of application in the treatment of liver metastases. The present study aimed to report the safety and efficacy of the AC technique with 10-year follow-up outcomes. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was made of patients in the database who had liver metastases, who did not undergo surgery or any other ablative approach for metastases, and who underwent SBRT with AC. In-field local control (ifLC) and toxicity were evaluated as primary endpoints. Results: The study examined 79 patients who underwent SBRT with AC between 2012 and 2021. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was the most common type of primary tumor (n = 32, 40.5%). The median follow-up was 14 (4-73) months. After treatment, one-year ifLC was 46.4%, six-month ifLC was 76%, one-year out-field local control (ofLC) was 13.6%, and six-month ofLC was 25%. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0, only 8 patients had low-grade acute gastro-intestinal toxicity, and no patients had late toxicity. Conclusions: SBRT with AC is a well -tolerated and effective treatment modality for patients with liver metastases.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
liver metastases, stereo-tactic body radiotherapy, abdominal compression, Phase-I/Ii Trial, Radiation-Therapy, Tumor Motion, Lung, Management, Reduction, Movement, Targets, Sbrt, Original Paper, stereotactic body radiotherapy, abdominal compression., R, Medicine, liver metastases
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Wspolczesna Onkologıa-Contemporary Oncology
Volume
26
Issue
2
Start Page
133
End Page
138
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 22
Google Scholar™


