Happiness Revisited: Ontological Well-Being as a Theory-Based Construct of Subjective Well-Being
Loading...
Files
Date
2009
Authors
Simsek, Oemer Faruk
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The current model of subjective well-being (SWB) has been operationalized as the unity of affective and cognitive dimensions concerning the evaluation of one's life, called emotional well-being and life satisfaction, respectively. There has been no theoretical framework, however, by which the unity is explained. The present paper offers a new construct of subjective well-being in an attempt to show that the cognitive and affective dimensions of SWB can be unified using the concept of goal. The concept of goal refers to the life as a project when the concern is the evaluation of life as a whole. The evaluation of the whole life, moreover, should take a whole-time perspective into account if it is supposed to be 'whole'. Ontological well-being (OWB) construct is structured in a theoretical framework by which the cognitive and affective components of the current conceptualization of SWB are reframed and interpreted in a whole time perspective. By taking as base the historical and philosophical resources of the affective and cognitive dimensions of subjective well-being, this new construct defines subjective well-being as one's evaluation of life in both past and future time perspectives in addition to the present.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Happiness, Subjective well-being, Time perspective, Eudaimonia, Life-satisfaction, Affect, Emotional well-being, Quality-Of-Life, Individual-Differences, Personal Projects, Time Perspective, Satisfaction, Self, Experience, Future, Psychology, Emotion
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
69
Source
Journal of Happıness Studıes
Volume
10
Issue
5
Start Page
505
End Page
522
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 33
Scopus : 72
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 178
SCOPUS™ Citations
72
checked on Mar 16, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
64
checked on Mar 16, 2026
Google Scholar™


