Understanding How Social Responsibility Drives Social Innovation: Characteristics of Radically Innovative Projects
Loading...
Files
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to analyze how corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives address sustainability challenges by focusing on the congruence between process and outcome variables of CSR. Design/methodology/approach Following a theory-driven model, a content analysis was conducted on 63 award-winning social responsibility projects. Findings The study reveals that the adoption of a proactive approach during environmental assessment, which manifests itself in a focus on emerging sustainability challenges with a deeper interest, affects the centrality of social responsibility initiative by increasing its learning and partnership potential and leads organizations to produce radical innovations. Practical implications The findings provide a valuable understanding for practitioners on organizing the decision making process of CSR initiatives in order to unlock its learning potentials. Social implications Radically innovative projects with their higher levels of proactivity, centrality and generalizability are better than incremental ones at transferring and integrating company resources and capabilities to address emergent sustainability challenges. Originality/value The impact of CSR on society and nature has been a neglected area of literature. To reduce this gap, this study analyzes how the configuration of process variables shapes the outcomes of socially responsible initiatives on sustainability. It also provides a new typology on the relevance of CSR initiatives to company mission/model that can show how CSR can unlock organizational learning and innovation potentials.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Corporate social responsibility, Environmental assessment, Issues management, Resource-based view, Stakeholder management, Social innovation, Triple-bottom line
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
European Journal of Innovatıon Management
Volume
25
Issue
3
Start Page
680
End Page
702
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 7
Scopus : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 114
Google Scholar™


