A Review of Sparsity-Based Clustering Methods
Loading...
Files
Date
2018
Authors
Turkan, Mehmet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In case of high dimensionality, a class of data clustering methods has been proposed as a solution that includes suitable subspace search to find inherent clusters. Sparsity-based clustering approaches include a twist in subspace approach as they incorporate a dimensionality expansion through the usage of an overcomplete dictionary representation. Thus, these approaches provide a broader search space to utilize subspace clustering at large. However, sparsity constraint alone does not enforce structured clusters. Through certain stricter constraints, data grouping is possible, which translates to a type of clustering depending on the types of constraints. The dual of the sparsity constraint, namely the dictionary, is another aspect of the whole sparsity-based clustering methods. Unlike off-the-shelf or fixed-waveform dictionaries, adaptive dictionaries can additionally be utilized to shape the state-model entity into a more adaptive form. Chained with structured sparsity, adaptive dictionaries force the state-model into well-formed clusters. Subspaces designated with structured sparsity can then be dissolved through recursion to acquire deep sparse structures that correspond to a taxonomy. As a final note, such procedure can further be extended to include various other machine learning perspectives. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Clustering, Sparse representations, Structured sparsity, Deep sparse structures, Efficient Algorithm, General Framework, K-Svd, Image, Representations, Dictionary, Model, Identification, Output, Noise
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
28
Source
Sıgnal Processıng
Volume
148
Issue
Start Page
20
End Page
30
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 25
Scopus : 40
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 50
Google Scholar™


