The Distance Effect on Discrimination Ability and Response Bias During Magnitude Comparison in a Go/No-go Task

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2021

Authors

Bulut, Merve
Can, Seda
Dural, Seda

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The distance effect is the change in the performance during numerical magnitude comparison, depending on the numerical distance between the compared numbers (Moyer & Landauer, Nature, 215[5109], 1519-1520, 1967). This effect is generally accepted as evidence for the mental number line (MNL) hypothesis, which proposes that the mental representation of the numbers align in an increasing linear (or monotone) order. The majority of studies investigating the distance effect are focused on the reaction time (RT) findings, which show slower responses for closer numbers. In the present study, we examined the distance effect by applying signal detection theory (SDT) to a magnitude comparison task. We aimed to reveal whether discrimination ability and the response bias measures were affected by the location of numbers on the MNL. To accomplish this, we developed a magnitude comparison task using a go/no-go procedure in which participants performed a magnitude comparison based on a reference number (i.e., 5). Results revealed a substantial distance effect in both sensitivity and response bias measures-a better discrimination performance for far numbers, and a larger response bias for close numbers. In addition, an RT distribution analysis revealed that the distance effect seems to originate mainly from slower responses. Based on the current data, we suggest that sensitivity and response bias measures could offer comprehensive information in the understanding of number-based decisions.

Description

Keywords

Mental number line, Distance effect, Magnitude comparison, Signal detection theory, Go, no-go task, Cognition, Reaction Time, Humans

Fields of Science

03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
3

Source

Attentıon Perceptıon & Psychophysıcs

Volume

83

Issue

5

Start Page

2052

End Page

2060
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 6

PubMed : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 22

SCOPUS™ Citations

6

checked on Mar 21, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

5

checked on Mar 21, 2026

Page Views

4

checked on Mar 21, 2026

Downloads

14

checked on Mar 21, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.2364

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available