Quality of Work Life and Working Conditions Among Oncology Nurses: a National Online Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
Loading...
Files
Date
2023
Authors
Karayurt, Ozgul
Curuk, Gulsum Nihal
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the quality of work life (QoWL) and working conditions of oncology nurses in Turkey. The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design. The data were collected via the introductory information form and Brooks' Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey. The study was completed with 138 nurses. The factors affecting QoWL were determined using stepwise multiple linear regression. Nurses had a moderate QoWL, and age, duration of working in nursing, the number of nurses, and the working style were significantly associated with QoWL. To improve the QoWL, the nurses' socio-demographic factors should be considered and working conditions should be improved. Furthermore, well-designed institutional policies should be developed to improve the patient-nurse ratio and provide a quality healthcare.
Description
Keywords
Quality of work life, working conditions, oncology nurse, nursing interventions, cross-sectional study, workers, chemical exposure, adults, occupational diseases, Of-Life, Compassion Fatigue, Job Stress, Burnout, Satisfaction, Hospitals, Intention, Program, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Nurses, Working Conditions, Quality of work life, working conditions, nursing interventions, occupational diseases, workers, adults, cross-sectional study, chemical exposure, oncology nurse
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 0305 other medical science
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Source
Archıves of Envıronmental & Occupatıonal Health
Volume
78
Issue
3
Start Page
131
End Page
141
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 7
PubMed : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 37
SCOPUS™ Citations
7
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
7
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Page Views
4
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


