Culture Related To Road Traffic Safety: a Comparison of Eight Countries Using Two Conceptualizations of Culture

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The majority of previous cross-country studies of human factors relevant to traffic safety have not operationalized and measured culture. Also studies in this vein have mostly been carried out in Europe and the United States. The aim of the study was to examine country cluster differences, based on the Culture's Consequences framework, in road traffic risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in samples from Norway, Russia, India, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda, Turkey and Iran. An additional aim was to examine cluster differences in road traffic culture as symbol use and to investigate whether this theoretical cultural framework predicts risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in the country clusters. The sample consisted of a total of 2418 individuals who were obtained by convenience sampling in the different countries. The countries segmented into four Culture's Consequences clusters; Norway, Russia and India, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Near East countries. The findings showed that Norwegians reported overall safer attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour than the remaining country clusters. Individuals in Africa reported the highest risk perception. The countries also differed substantially in road traffic culture as symbol use. Contrary to established cultural theory, prediction models revealed that cultural factors were stronger predictors of driver behaviour than of risk perception. Also, the social cognitive risk constructs (i.e. risk perception and attitudes) solely explained variance in driver behaviour in the Norwegian and Russia/India clusters. Previous empirical efforts, which aimed to demonstrate that culture is important for the risk perception criterion, may have focused on a criterion variable that is not strongly related to driver behaviour. Furthermore, countermeasures aimed to influence social cognition may have stronger applicability in countries with a more individualistic western cultural orientation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Culture's consequences, Culture as symbol use, Attitudes, Driver behaviour, Risk perception, Cross-cultural, Risk Perception, Driving Behavior, Driver Behavior, Attitudes, Accident, Self, Personality, Predictors, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Risk, Automobile Driving, Cultural Characteristics, Norway, Accidents, Traffic, India, Iran, Middle Aged, Ghana, Tanzania, Russia, Risk-Taking, Attitude, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Safety

Fields of Science

05 social sciences, 0502 economics and business

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
65

Source

Accıdent Analysıs And Preventıon

Volume

62

Issue

Start Page

319

End Page

328
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 17

Scopus : 69

PubMed : 9

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 187

SCOPUS™ Citations

69

checked on Mar 15, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

62

checked on Mar 15, 2026

Page Views

3

checked on Mar 15, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
3.7993

Sustainable Development Goals

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo