Culture Related To Road Traffic Safety: a Comparison of Eight Countries Using Two Conceptualizations of Culture
Loading...
Files
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The majority of previous cross-country studies of human factors relevant to traffic safety have not operationalized and measured culture. Also studies in this vein have mostly been carried out in Europe and the United States. The aim of the study was to examine country cluster differences, based on the Culture's Consequences framework, in road traffic risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in samples from Norway, Russia, India, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda, Turkey and Iran. An additional aim was to examine cluster differences in road traffic culture as symbol use and to investigate whether this theoretical cultural framework predicts risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in the country clusters. The sample consisted of a total of 2418 individuals who were obtained by convenience sampling in the different countries. The countries segmented into four Culture's Consequences clusters; Norway, Russia and India, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Near East countries. The findings showed that Norwegians reported overall safer attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour than the remaining country clusters. Individuals in Africa reported the highest risk perception. The countries also differed substantially in road traffic culture as symbol use. Contrary to established cultural theory, prediction models revealed that cultural factors were stronger predictors of driver behaviour than of risk perception. Also, the social cognitive risk constructs (i.e. risk perception and attitudes) solely explained variance in driver behaviour in the Norwegian and Russia/India clusters. Previous empirical efforts, which aimed to demonstrate that culture is important for the risk perception criterion, may have focused on a criterion variable that is not strongly related to driver behaviour. Furthermore, countermeasures aimed to influence social cognition may have stronger applicability in countries with a more individualistic western cultural orientation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Culture's consequences, Culture as symbol use, Attitudes, Driver behaviour, Risk perception, Cross-cultural, Risk Perception, Driving Behavior, Driver Behavior, Attitudes, Accident, Self, Personality, Predictors, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Risk, Automobile Driving, Cultural Characteristics, Norway, Accidents, Traffic, India, Iran, Middle Aged, Ghana, Tanzania, Russia, Risk-Taking, Attitude, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Safety
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0502 economics and business
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
65
Source
Accıdent Analysıs And Preventıon
Volume
62
Issue
Start Page
319
End Page
328
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 17
Scopus : 69
PubMed : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 187
SCOPUS™ Citations
69
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
62
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Mar 15, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
3.7993
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


