Public Confidence in the Judiciary: the Interaction Between Political Awareness and Level of Democracy
Loading...
Files
Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Apart from the studies that focus on public attitudes toward higher courts in advanced democracies, we know little about the factors that can explain public confidence in the judiciary in a comparative setting. In this regard, the goal of this study is to explain whether, and to what extent, the country's level of democracy moderates the impact of political awareness on public confidence in the judiciary. This study uses hierarchical linear models to analyse the interaction between individual and country level factors by using the World Values Survey (2005-2009) data for 49 countries and various other data sources. Our empirical results show that in advanced democracies political awareness variables like education and political participation have a positive impact on public confidence in the judiciary, whereas in countries with weak levels of democracy higher political awareness leads to increased cynicism about the judiciary. These results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to explain confidence in the judiciary is not possible when we are dealing with a wide range of societies that vary in terms of many characteristics, both institutional and cultural.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
hierarchical models, political awareness, public trust in institutions, judicial performance, public confidence in the judiciary, judicial legitimacy, Spreading-Activation Theory, Legitimacy, Support, Trust, Knowledge, Attitudes, Dynamics, Rise, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0506 political science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
24
Source
Democratızatıon
Volume
23
Issue
4
Start Page
634
End Page
656
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 29
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 36
Google Scholar™


