Isbitiren, Yagmur OzbekKiyi, IlaydaYener, Görsev2023-06-162023-06-1620222602-30322602-3040https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1179620https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1149657https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2356Purpose: The aim of this study is to present the sensitivity, specificity and cut-off points of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), semantic and phonemic fluency tests determined by ROC curve analysis in differentiating between Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Materials and Methods: Age-education-sex matched 72 healthy individuals, 72 MCI and 72 AD dementia individuals were included in the study. MMSE, semantic and phonemic fluency tests were applied to all participants. Sensitivity and specificity values and cut-off scores of MMSE, semantic and phonemic fluency tests in distinguishing healthy, MCI and ADD individuals were obtained by ROC curve analysis.Results: ROC analyses show that all three tests can significantly discriminate between healthy, ADD and MCI individuals. It was seen that the discrimination power of the MMSE was higher than the verbal fluency tests when the areas under the ROC curve were compared. The specificity of semantic fluency was found to be higher than MMSE and phonemic fluency in distinguishing individuals with ADD and MCI.Conclusion: The findings of the study show that MMSE is stronger than semantic and phonemic fluency in distinguishing healthy individuals, but its specificity is lower than semantic fluency in distinguishing MCI and AD dementia. In order to increase the diagnostic accuracy, it may be effective to add verbal fluency tests, especially semantic fluency test, which can be applied in a short time, to clinical practice.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMini Mentalverbal fluencydementiadiagnostic accuracyMCIAlzheimer?s diseaseMild Cognitive ImpairmentVerbal FluencyAssociation WorkgroupsDiagnostic GuidelinesNational InstituteState-ExaminationSemantic FluencyDementiaDiseaseRecommendationsArticle10.17826/cumj.1179620