Panayirci, Ugur CevdetIseri, EmreSekercioglu, Eser2023-06-162023-06-1620160267-32311460-3705https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116669455https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2189This article aims to determine the stances of media outlets during crises in a polarized media system such as Turkey. Adopting a content analysis methodology, this article analyses the framing strategies of three national newspapers affiliated with certain sociopolitical camps (namely, the pro-government Sabah, the anti-government Kemalist Sozcu and the pro-Gulen Zaman) to observe possible similarities/differences during the critical 17 December corruption probe. The findings not only confirm earlier studies on press-party' parallelism but also reveal press-sociopolitical camp parallelism' in Turkey's polarized media system.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessCorruption (political)framingmediamedia systemspolitical parallelismpower (political)PressDemocracyCoverageArticle10.1177/02673231166694552-s2.0-84991280543