Examining the Views of Engineering Students About Massive Open Online Courses
Loading...
Files
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IEEE
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Today, one of the most important tools of open and distance learning, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) has emerged as a continuation of the Open Educational Resources approach. The Open Education Resources (OER) approach was first introduced in 1999, and gained a great momentum in 2002 with the help of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). MOOCs are defined as a scalable, free online course with open access that supports learning in different fields. Thanks to these platforms, an interaction between learner-learner and learner-intructor is established and a flexible learning environment is provided. MOOCs, which first appeared in 2008, have increased their popularity with MOOC platforms that include hundreds of courses such as edX, Coursera, Udemy and Udacity with the support of many important universities in the world such as MIT and Harvard. In this study, the thoughts of engineering students about MOOCs were asked with a questionnaire which was used as a data collection tool developed by the researchers. The study was attended by 307 students studying Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Civil Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Food Engineering
Description
30th Annual Conference of the European-Association-for-Education-in-Electrical-and-Information-Engineering (EAEEIE) -- SEP 01-03, 2021 -- Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Keywords
MOOCs, distance education, Engineering, Moocs, Engineering, MOOCs, distance education, Moocs
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Proceedıngs of the 2021 30Th Annual Conference of the European Assocıatıon For Educatıon in Electrıcal And Informatıon Engıneerıng (Eaeeıe)
Volume
Issue
Start Page
46
End Page
49
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
Page Views
7
checked on Mar 23, 2026
Google Scholar™


