Balancing and Scheduling of Flexible Mixed Model Assembly Lines
Loading...
Files
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Mixed model assembly line literature involves two problems: balancing and model sequencing. The general tendency in current studies is to deal with these problems in different time frames. However, in today's competitive market, the mixed model assembly line balancing problem has been turned into an operational problem. In this paper, we propose mixed integer programming (MIP) and constraint programming (CP) models which consider both balancing and model sequencing within the same formulation along with the optimal schedule of tasks at a station. Furthermore, we also compare the proposed exact models with decomposition schemes developed for solving different instances of varying sizes. This is the first paper in the literature which takes into account the network type precedence diagrams and limited buffer capacities between stations. Besides, it is the first study that CP method is applied to balancing and scheduling of mixed model assembly lines. Our empirical study shows that the CP approach outperforms the MIP approach as well as the decomposition schemes.
Description
Keywords
Mixed model assembly lines, Balancing, Sequencing, Scheduling, Mixed integer programming, Constraint programming, Decomposition, Programming Techniques, Manufacturing Systems, Algorithms, constraint programming, decomposition, Mixed integer programming, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, sequencing, scheduling, balancing, mixed model assembly lines, mixed integer programming
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
34
Source
Constraınts
Volume
18
Issue
3
Start Page
434
End Page
469
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 17
Scopus : 36
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 44
SCOPUS™ Citations
36
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
35
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Page Views
4
checked on Mar 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


