A Hierarchical P2p Clustering Framework for Video Streaming Systems
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, a novel overlay architecture for constructing hierarchical and scalable clustering of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks is proposed. The proposed architecture attempts to enhance the clustering of peers by incorporating join, split, merge and cluster leader election mechanisms in a fully distributed manner. It takes delay proximity of peers into account as distance measure. By constructing hierarchical clustering of peers, the control message overhead and maintenance such as host departure/host join overhead are decreased. Theoretical comparisons on overheads of the proposed system with that of other systems from literature are studied. The control mechanism for dynamic peer behavior of the architecture is tested over PlanetLab. The performance metrics used are end-to-end delay, diameter, cluster head distance, occupancy rate, peer join latency, accuracy and correctness. The test results are compared with Hierarchical Ring Tree (HRT) and mOverlay architecture. In addition, a P2P video streaming application is run over the proposed network overlay. Streaming tests show that video streaming applications perform well in terms of received video quality if hierarchical clusters considering delay proximity are used as underlying network architecture. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Peer-to-Peer networks, Overlay networks, Hierarchical clustering, PlanetLab, Peer, Multicast, Vivaldi, Overlay networks, PlanetLab, Peer-to-Peer networks, Hierarchical clustering
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Volume
49
Issue
Start Page
44
End Page
58
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 20
SCOPUS™ Citations
13
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
12
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Page Views
7
checked on Mar 17, 2026
Google Scholar™


