A Team Building Model for Software Engineering Courses Term Projects
Loading...
Files
Date
2011
Authors
Sahin, Yasar Guneri
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper proposes a new model for team building, which enables teachers to build coherent teams rapidly and fairly for the term projects of software engineering courses. Moreover, the model can also be used to build teams for any type of project, if the team member candidates are students, or if they are inexperienced on a certain subject. The proposed model takes students' preferences and the teacher's considerations into account when a team building process is required for any type of course. In addition, this paper investigates how team building models (RandomM: teams are built with randomly selected students; TeacherM: teacher selects the members for each team; StudentsM: students build their own teams and the proposed model) affect team performance and how gender differences affect project activities and team performance. A three-year (five semesters) teaching experiment was performed with the participation of 248 male and 79 female university students and a total of 67 software project teams. Two different One-way ANOVA tests were applied on the experimental data, and the results indicated that the proposed model was better than RandomM, TeacherM and StudentsM models in terms of project grades, and the effect of gender differences on the teams' performance and project activities was negligible. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Architectures for educational technology system, Evaluation methodologies, Gender studies, Improving classroom teaching, Team building, Education, Students
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0503 education
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
23
Source
Computers & Educatıon
Volume
56
Issue
3
Start Page
916
End Page
922
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 11
Scopus : 32
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 102
SCOPUS™ Citations
32
checked on Mar 21, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
24
checked on Mar 21, 2026
Page Views
7
checked on Mar 21, 2026
Google Scholar™


