Learned Vs. Hand-Designed Features for Ecg Beat Classification: a Comprehensive Study
Loading...
Files
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, in order to find out the best ECG classification performance we realized comparative evaluations among the state-of-the-art classifiers such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Furthermore, we compared the performance of the learned features from the last convolutional layer of trained 1-D CNN classifier against the handcrafted features that are extracted by Principal Component Analysis, Hermite Transform and Dyadic Wavelet Transform. Experimental results over the MIT-BIH arrhythmia benchmark database demonstrate that the single channel (raw ECG data based) shallow 1D CNN classifier over the learned features in general achieves the highest classification accuracy and computational efficiency. Finally, it is observed that the use of the learned features on either SVM or MLP classifiers does not yield any performance improvement.
Description
Joint Conference of the European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC) / Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics (NBC) -- JUN, 2017 -- Tampere, FINLAND
Keywords
Real-time ECG Classification, Convolutional Neural Networks, learned and hand-crafted features, Support vector machines, Learned and hand-crafted features, Classification (of information), Principal component analysis, Multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), Comparative evaluations, Convolutional neural network, Ecg classifications, Ecg beat classifications, Convolution, Education, Computational efficiency, Biochemical engineering, Electrocardiography, Wavelet transforms, Support vector machine (SVMs), Dyadic wavelet transform, Biomedical engineering, Neural networks
Fields of Science
0206 medical engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q4

OpenCitations Citation Count
4
Source
Embec & Nbc 2017
Volume
65
Issue
Start Page
551
End Page
554
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 18
SCOPUS™ Citations
3
checked on Mar 20, 2026
Google Scholar™


