Learned Vs. Hand-Designed Features for Ecg Beat Classification: a Comprehensive Study

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer-Verlag Singapore Pte Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this study, in order to find out the best ECG classification performance we realized comparative evaluations among the state-of-the-art classifiers such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Furthermore, we compared the performance of the learned features from the last convolutional layer of trained 1-D CNN classifier against the handcrafted features that are extracted by Principal Component Analysis, Hermite Transform and Dyadic Wavelet Transform. Experimental results over the MIT-BIH arrhythmia benchmark database demonstrate that the single channel (raw ECG data based) shallow 1D CNN classifier over the learned features in general achieves the highest classification accuracy and computational efficiency. Finally, it is observed that the use of the learned features on either SVM or MLP classifiers does not yield any performance improvement.

Description

Joint Conference of the European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC) / Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics (NBC) -- JUN, 2017 -- Tampere, FINLAND

Keywords

Real-time ECG Classification, Convolutional Neural Networks, learned and hand-crafted features, Support vector machines, Learned and hand-crafted features, Classification (of information), Principal component analysis, Multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), Comparative evaluations, Convolutional neural network, Ecg classifications, Ecg beat classifications, Convolution, Education, Computational efficiency, Biochemical engineering, Electrocardiography, Wavelet transforms, Support vector machine (SVMs), Dyadic wavelet transform, Biomedical engineering, Neural networks

Fields of Science

0206 medical engineering, 02 engineering and technology, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine

Citation

WoS Q

N/A

Scopus Q

Q4
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
4

Source

Embec & Nbc 2017

Volume

65

Issue

Start Page

551

End Page

554
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 3

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 18

SCOPUS™ Citations

3

checked on Mar 20, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.3193

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available