Imagine a Mouse and an Elephant: Hemispheric Asymmetries of Imagination
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore the existence of an asymmetrical bias in the imagination of pairs of objects of unequal size. We assumed that such pairs are conceptualized with the smaller object being placed on the left, creating an ascending size order from left to right. Such a bias could derive from a cognitive strategy known from the mental number line. Sixty-four participants were instructed to imagine stimulus-pairs that were staggered from those showing very prominent intra-pair size differences (e.g., elephant vs. mouse) to very low size differences (e.g., orange vs. apple). The results showed that the tendency to imagine the bigger object on the right side increases with the size difference of the two stimuli. Such a visual field bias was also present in stimulus-pairs including numbers so that the participants imagined smaller and larger numbers on the left and the right side of the visual fields, respectively. Taken together, our findings could imply that the left-to-right orientation observed in our object imagining task may share the same cognitive mechanism as the mental number line.
Description
Keywords
Imagination, object size, visual field bias, mental number line, Mental Number Line, Parietal Cortex, Representations, Attention, Space, Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Functional Laterality, Young Adult, Imagination, Humans, Female, Visual Fields
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Lateralıty
Volume
22
Issue
3
Start Page
354
End Page
361
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 3
PubMed : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 12
Google Scholar™


