Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1527
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzbay, C.-
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Türkan-
dc.contributor.authorYigitoglu, A. Guler-
dc.contributor.authorBayburt, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:18:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:18:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8451-
dc.identifier.issn1769-700X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021037-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1527-
dc.description.abstractThe recent rapid development and increasing complexity of radiotherapy devices and applications has increased the importance of correct and safe treatment. Risk management is very important in radiotherapy (RT), because incorrect treatment can have serious consequences in terms of mortality or morbidity. However, there are currently few studies on risk analysis in RT. This quantitative and qualitative study of the radiotherapy system (all radiotherapy process) uses the fault tree method, one of the probabilistic risk assessment methods in radiotherapy applications, which is used to devise accident preventive actions. First of all, RT applications were divided into simulation, treatment planning and treatment delivery. For each, work flow charts were determined, and fault trees were created in SAPHIRE (Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations) software. Fault probabilities were determined using the expert judgment method. This analysis allowed the identification of the weak points of the system, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The analyzes also revealed that there was a 0.5% occurrence probability of a top event, determined as an incorrect dose or dose distribution in RT. It was determined that the greatest contribution to this probability value was matching error with image guidance, 7.88%. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was found to facilitate a detailed examination of the radiotherapy system. After the risk analysis, the appropriate quality control method for weak points should be determined and implemented for safety management in radiotherapy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdp Sciences S Aen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRadıoprotectıonen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectradiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectfault treeen_US
dc.subjectprobabilistic risk analysisen_US
dc.subjectexpert judgmenten_US
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRadiation-Therapyen_US
dc.titleProbabilistic risk assessment of radiotherapy applicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/radiopro/2021037-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124133505en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authorscopusid57478910500-
dc.authorscopusid57189995398-
dc.authorscopusid57218187237-
dc.authorscopusid35100080200-
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage33en_US
dc.identifier.endpage40en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000762000000005en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept15.07. Optician-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

170
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.