Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Cansu-
dc.contributor.authorOflac, Bengu Sevil-
dc.contributor.authorYurt, Oznur-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:25:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:25:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2055-6225-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2016-0094-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/1914-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the doer effect of service failure (SF), good prior experience (GPE) and recovery on overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions for multi-agents in tourism service supply chain (TSSC). It specifically focuses on internal and external failure and recovery. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a 2x2x3 between-subjects experimental design with 12 diverse scenarios. It aims to examine the main effects of GPE and the interaction effects of SF and recovery on overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions. Findings The main findings show that consumers do not show favorable behavioral outcomes when they have GPE with an affiliated party. Results of the experiments demonstrate that for hotels, there is no interaction effect between failure and recovery regarding overall customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions; however, for travel agencies, an interaction effect has been found. This indicates that an internal failure (by travel agency) should be recovered internally to increase the behavioral outcomes for travel agency. However, if there is an external failure (by hotel) then the essential thing is providing a recovery. Originality/value Although the service literature covers failure and recovery in diverse contexts, these concepts are rarely studied from a multi-agent perspective in the service supply chain literature. In such a chain, a failure by a different party may remain unresolved, and this may create a positive effect on another party, if they provide recovery for the failure. This means that the doer of the failure and/or recovery (the party responsible from the failure and/or recovery) may have an impact on behavioral outcomes. However, previous literature has neglected to focus on the important issue of which entity/party performs the failure and/or recovery, and the effect on behavioral outcomes. By focusing on a principal-agent relationship in a TSSC, the study aims to address this research gap.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Servıce Theory And Practıceen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectService failureen_US
dc.subjectService recoveryen_US
dc.subjectAgency theoryen_US
dc.subjectEquity theoryen_US
dc.subjectTourism service supply chainen_US
dc.subjectAgency-Theoryen_US
dc.subjectCustomer Satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectPerceived Justiceen_US
dc.subjectModerating Roleen_US
dc.subjectEncountersen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.subjectPerceptionsen_US
dc.subjectResponsesen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectLoyaltyen_US
dc.titleThe doer effect of failure and recovery in multi-agent cases: service supply chain perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JSTP-05-2016-0094-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044040957en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridYurt, Oznur/0000-0003-1510-5844-
dc.authoridSevil Oflac, Bengu/0000-0002-8617-4284-
dc.authoridYILDIRIM, Cansu/0000-0003-1061-9854-
dc.authorwosidYurt, Oznur/GZK-3592-2022-
dc.authorwosidYILDIRIM, Cansu/HJP-9779-2023-
dc.authorwosidYILDIRIM, CANSU/HJG-5501-2022-
dc.authorwosidYILDIRIM, Cansu/S-6831-2019-
dc.authorscopusid57209060344-
dc.authorscopusid36156131200-
dc.authorscopusid16041143900-
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage274en_US
dc.identifier.endpage297en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000432185600001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.05. Logistics Management-
crisitem.author.dept03.05. Logistics Management-
crisitem.author.dept03.05. Logistics Management-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
1914.pdf366.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Nov 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.