Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2443
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Yasar Guneri-
dc.contributor.authorCelikkan, Ufuk-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:40:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:40:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1547-9714-
dc.identifier.issn1539-3585-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.28945/4553-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2443-
dc.description.abstractAim/Purpose This paper investigates the gaps between industry and academia perceptions of information technology fields, such as computer science, software engineering, and computer engineering, and it identifies areas of asymmetry between curricula and industry expectations. The study mainly focuses on the skills required of IT professionals (graduated students) and on how higher education institutes equip students for industry. Background Higher education institutes have several IT-related departments. However, it is not clear whether these departments have sufficient content to equip students with industry-related skills. Rapid advances mean that some curriculum topics are redundant before the end of a standard two- or four-year degree programs. Balancing the technical/non-technical skills and adjusting the curricula to better prepare the students for industry is a constant demand for higher education institutions. Several studies have demonstrated that a generic curriculum is inadequate to address current IT industry needs. Methodology The study involved a comprehensive survey of IT professionals and companies using a Web-based questionnaire sent directly to individual companies, academics, and employers. 64 universities and 38 companies in 24 countries were represented by the 209 participants, of whom 99 were IT professionals, 72 academics, and 38 employers. Contribution This paper is intended to guide academics in preparing dynamic curricula that can be easily adapted to current industry trends and technological developments, with content directly relevant to student's careers. In addition, the results may identify the skills that students need to secure employment and the courses that will provide skills in line with current industry trends. Findings The results indicate a lack of emphasis on personal and non-technical skills in undergraduate education compared to general computer science, software development, and coding courses. Employers' and software experts' responses emphasize that soft skills should not be ignored, and that, of these, analytical thinking and teamwork are the two most requested. Rather than a theoretical emphasis, courses should include hands-on projects. Rapid developments and innovations in information technologies demand that spiral and waterfall models are replaced with emerging software development models, such as Agile and Scrum development. Recommendations for Practitioners A multidisciplinary approach should be taken to the teaching of soft skills, such as communication, ethics, leadership, and customer relations. Establishing multiple learning tracks in IT education would equip students with specialized knowledge and skills in IT. An effective communication channel should be established between students and industry. It is also important to reduce the distance between academics and students and to provide an interactive environment for technical discussions. Enterprise level computing and Framework use provide job market advantages. Recommendations for Researchers Researchers and department heads, particularly those involved in curriculum design and accreditation, could use the results of this exemplary study to identify key topics for attention. Impact on Society Changes of various degrees are required in the current curricula in many higher education institutions to better meet student needs. Societies and technology are dynamic in nature, and information technology-related curricula in higher education institutions should be equally dynamic. Future Research Since technology (especially information technology) transforms and advances itself so rapidly, this study should be replicated t to investigate how these changes affect the gap between revised curricula and current industry expectations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforming Science Insten_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Informatıon Technology Educatıon-Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectasymmetry in software educationen_US
dc.subjecthigher education and industry gapsen_US
dc.subjectinformation technology educationen_US
dc.subjectSoftware Engineering-Educationen_US
dc.subjectSkillsen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalsen_US
dc.subjectCurriculumen_US
dc.subjectAcademiaen_US
dc.subjectNeedsen_US
dc.titleINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASYMMETRY AND GAPS BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND INDUSTRYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.28945/4553-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087478946en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridSahin, Yasar Guneri/0000-0002-7148-946X-
dc.authorwosidSahin, Yasar Guneri/D-9766-2014-
dc.authorscopusid15119717900-
dc.authorscopusid6506405451-
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.startpage339en_US
dc.identifier.endpage365en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000542995600001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept05.04. Software Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept05.04. Software Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2443.pdf2.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Sep 11, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Sep 11, 2024

Page view(s)

388
checked on Aug 19, 2024

Download(s)

304
checked on Aug 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.