Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Yasar Guneri-
dc.contributor.authorCelikkan, Ufuk-
dc.contributor.authorSenuzun, Fisun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:48:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:48:29Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-908272-42-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2770-
dc.description12th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG) -- JUN 14-15, 2012 -- ESADE, Inst Publ Governance & Management, Barcelona, SPAINen_US
dc.description.abstractThe use of electronic health records (EHR) has become an important issue for accurate medical diagnosis. However, there exist two main difficulties in the creation of electronic health records which make EHR systems hard to deploy: collection of EHR data is time consuming and it is an error prone process. Selection of the most appropriate methods and tools is, therefore, significant for data entry by the health care providers at the point of care in order to maximize productivity. We have conducted a questionnaire to record health care professionals' perceptions of data entry process and determine the functions that, in the view of the professionals', would facilitate the process. The questionnaire consists of 18 basic questions, posted on several web sites which host questionnaires, and was also mailed to health care professionals working in various hospitals over a period of 10 months. Totally, 533 medical care professionals from 29 different countries participated in the survey, of which 284 were M. D., 127 were nurses and the remainder was other medical professionals. The questions focused on the following: workload, performance, productivity, data entry methods that are currently in use or preferred, potential productivity increase from using technological tools in creating EHR and motivational factors for the acceptance of a convenient data entry tool. The results indicate that the health care professionals have an excessive workload, and the use of convenient data entry tools would contribute to increase in productivity. While the clear majority of participants involved in data entry use keyboard and mouse, most expressed a preference for more convenient methods, such as voice recognition or touch screen. Furthermore, physicians reported rarely spending more than 15 minutes for each consultation and conducting 21-30 examinations a day. The main motivation for creating an efficient direct data entry was therefore, to increase time for patient examination and improve accuracy of the diagnosis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcad Conferences Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedıngs of the 12Th European Conference on Egovernment, Vols 1 And 2en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecte-Healthen_US
dc.subjectphysicians productivityen_US
dc.subjectdata entryen_US
dc.subjecttechnology in medicineen_US
dc.subjectPatient Communicationen_US
dc.subjectPrimary-Careen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectRecorden_US
dc.subjectPhysiciansen_US
dc.subjectFacultyen_US
dc.titleEffects of Data Entry Tools on Health Professionals' Productivity: A Surveyen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridAykar, Fisun Şenuzun/0000-0002-3466-4943-
dc.authorwosidAykar, Fisun Şenuzun/AAS-2972-2021-
dc.identifier.startpage618en_US
dc.identifier.endpage624en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000308239000072en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept05.04. Software Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept05.04. Software Engineering-
Appears in Collections:WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

70
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.