Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3372
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbedinifar M.-
dc.contributor.authorErtugrul S.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:57:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:57:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9.78303E+12-
dc.identifier.issn2367-3370-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85626-7_65-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3372-
dc.descriptionInternational Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, INFUS 2021 -- 24 August 2021 through 26 August 2021 -- 264409en_US
dc.description.abstractFor an accurate dynamic analysis of the real-world systems, there is an extensive demand for developing the mathematical models. An accurate mathematical model can be used for optimization, fault diagnosis, controller design, etc. Many studies have been performed for developing the mathematical models of the real-world systems. They commonly utilize linear models while ignoring the possible existing nonlinearities in the model. However, having a general mathematical model including nonlinearities has great significance in performance analysis and proper control of the systems. In this paper, two algorithms including Nonlinear Least Squares Errors (NLSE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are utilized for model identification. For this aim, the nonlinear model of a Direct Current (DC) motor is used as a case study to compare the performance of the two algorithms. In the first step, a white-box mathematical model of the DC motor including the nonlinear friction terms is developed. Then, the artificial data is generated through the developed model with the real parameters of a DC motor. Finally, NLSE and PSO algorithms are carried out to determine the unknown parameters of the nonlinear model through generated artificial data. All unknown parameters of the model are identified at the same time. The results of the two algorithms are evaluated and compared. It is shown that the PSO algorithm determines the model parameters more accurately compared to the NLSE algorithm. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLecture Notes in Networks and Systemsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIdentificationen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear least square errorsen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear modelingen_US
dc.subjectParticle Swarm Optimizationen_US
dc.titleComparative Study of Identification Using Nonlinear Least Squares Errors and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms for a Nonlinear DC Motor Modelen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-85626-7_65-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85115051447en_US
dc.authorscopusid57261834700-
dc.identifier.volume307en_US
dc.identifier.startpage554en_US
dc.identifier.endpage561en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept05.11. Mechatronics Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

98
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.