Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3374
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStaub, Donald-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:57:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:57:58Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2213-3208-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_13-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3374-
dc.description.abstractStudents entering English-medium Instruction (EMI) universities and programs must demonstrate English language proficiency before proceeding to their academic program. Approximately 20% of incoming students are able to pass a proficiency exam and begin academic studies straight away. This leaves a significant percentage of students needing to successfully complete an intensive language program before progressing to their academic departments. The majority of these students require 1 year (or more) to achieve this goal. Because of the rigorous demands of the intensive language program, all such students are at risk for not completing the program and leaving the university. There are distinct sub-populations within the language program that have an even higher propensity for attrition. For those who leave, there may be immense psychological, social, and financial ramifications. Likewise for the institution – failing to retain students may have significant implications for finances and reputation. EMI universities and intensive language programs may establish student retention initiatives to minimize attrition. This chapter makes the case for such initiatives, briefly exploring student retention, then through the lens of vulnerable sub-populations, explores best-practices that may strengthen retention in the intensive language program, while having a long-term impact on the students and the institution. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofMultilingual Educationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnglish-medium instructionen_US
dc.subjectIntensive English programen_US
dc.subjectStudent attritionen_US
dc.subjectStudent retentionen_US
dc.titleWhy Student Retention Matters for Turkish EMI Universities?en_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_13-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136046685en_US
dc.authorscopusid57194149867-
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.startpage257en_US
dc.identifier.endpage273en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept13.08. Undergraduate English Coordinator-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
WhyStudent-StaubDonald.pdf287.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

80
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

48
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.