Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUstunluoglu E.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:59:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:59:29Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn1354-0602-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601106096-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3483-
dc.description.abstractThe employment of native teachers of English in countries where English is a foreign language, coupled with a growing concern over teaching effectiveness, has led to collecting data about teachers' performance through student feedback. Not much research has been carried out in Turkey to evaluate the process and output of language teaching by native and non-native teachers from students' points of view. The aim of this study is to identify university students' perceptions of native and non-native teachers of English as well as to identify deficiencies and needs in the teaching process so that some suggestions can be made. A data pool of 311 university students participated in this study and evaluated 38 native and non-native teachers of English. A questionnaire was used as the instrument and it consisted of 30 items related to in-class teaching roles, in-class management roles, in-class communication roles, and individual features. The results indicate that there is a meaningful difference between native and non-native teachers of English from the students' perspective. The results suggest that non-native teachers fulfil in-class teaching and in-class management roles better than native teachers do while native teachers fulfil in-class communication skills and present more favourable qualities. The results will be beneficial for native and non-native teachers in terms of realizing their deficiencies and raising awareness. For further research, using student achievement level along with the results of student ratings would lead to more convincing results. The evaluation of teachers by their students is not a widely used approach in Turkey and further research in this area would benefit from a wider subject base.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTeachers and Teaching: Theory and Practiceen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectNative/Non-native teachersen_US
dc.subjectStudent ratingsen_US
dc.titleUniversity students' perceptions of native and non-native teachersen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13540600601106096-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-52949123083en_US
dc.authorscopusid23973769000-
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.endpage79en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.dept13.08. Undergraduate English Coordinator-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2579.pdf
  Restricted Access
197.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Sep 18, 2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on Aug 19, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Aug 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.