Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3584
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzcan S.-
dc.contributor.authorOzyazici M.S.-
dc.contributor.authorOzerdem M.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T15:00:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T15:00:51Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.isbn9.78151E+12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806533-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3584-
dc.descriptionInFocus Corporation;Portland State University Foundationen_US
dc.description2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET 2016 -- 4 September 2016 through 8 September 2016 -- 125891en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to establish a new performance measurement method for academic actors for their changing roles in innovation systems. The widely accepted triple helix and systems of innovation models show changing and overlapping roles of academic, industrial and governmental actors. In previous innovation systems, universities were not focused on applied research and technology transfer as much as they are now. Current literature shows a changing role of universities and importance of their involvement in innovation systems. Although academic organizations' roles have changed in innovation systems, academic performance measurement systems (APMS) are not adapted to examine innovation related performance factors. Many APMS focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as; publications, research projects and patents. However, the new APMS needs to assess the activities and processes that are related to innovation, such as; technology transfer processes, collaborative innovation activities, consultancies and academic spin-offs. For this study a new APMS is applied according to the needs of universities by using a synthetic data based on an engineering department's KPIs. APMS scores are calculated based on the cumulative metric of all research and innovation activities and, weighted according to the needs and considerations of the university. The results of this study show that many of those academicians who have great performance in publications and academic research do not necessarily have high-level performance in innovative activities. In fact the results show that those who had high points in some measurements have very low performance in others. For the management point of view, it may be more effective to position academicians for different roles and assess their performance accordingly as innovation-targeted, teaching-targeted and research-targeted academicians. © 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPICMET 2016 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management For Social Innovation, Proceedingsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectPatents and inventionsen_US
dc.subjectSocieties and institutionsen_US
dc.subjectSupply chain managementen_US
dc.subjectTechnology transferen_US
dc.subjectAcademic performanceen_US
dc.subjectCollaborative innovationen_US
dc.subjectEngineering departmenten_US
dc.subjectInnovation activityen_US
dc.subjectInnovative activitiesen_US
dc.subjectKey performance indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectPerformance factorsen_US
dc.subjectPerformance measurementsen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.titleAcademic performance management policy for changing roles of universities in innovation systemsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806533-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85016199845en_US
dc.authorscopusid55767986400-
dc.authorscopusid57193736339-
dc.identifier.startpage2805en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2809en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000403104502062en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2675.pdf111.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Page view(s)

86
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.