Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3679
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMylonas K.-
dc.contributor.authorFurnham A.-
dc.contributor.authorDivale W.-
dc.contributor.authorLeblebici, Çiğdem-
dc.contributor.authorGondim S.-
dc.contributor.authorMoniz A.-
dc.contributor.authorGrad H.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T15:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T15:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0013-1644-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413502669-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3679-
dc.description.abstractSeveral sources of bias can plague research data and individual assessment. When cultural groups are considered, across or even within countries, it is essential that the constructs assessed and evaluated are as free as possible from any source of bias and specifically from bias caused due to culturally specific characteristics. Employing the Explanations of Unemployment Scale (revised form) for a sample of 1,894 employed and unemployed adults across eight countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Turkey, Spain, Romania, Poland, Greece, and Brazil), we applied a method based on individual differences multidimensional scaling and principal component analysis to detect item bias in terms of culture and try to eliminate this bias variance from the overall item variance so as to (a) avoid jeopardizing validity levels and (b) arrive at clearer and more meaningful dimensions after adjusting the raw scores by removing the bias part. The results supported our statistical-psychometric intervention as the structure computed for the unadjusted data was enhanced and clarified when the data were adjusted for bias in terms of culture. Finally, implications for individual assessment procedures are discussed, and a method for evaluating the relative impact of bias in terms of culture on the raw assessment scores is also presented. © The Author(s) 2013.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEducational and Psychological Measurementen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbias impact and eliminationen_US
dc.subjectbias in terms of cultureen_US
dc.subjectexplanations of unemploymenten_US
dc.subjectindividual assessmenten_US
dc.subjectindividual differences Euclidean distanceen_US
dc.titleBias in Terms of Culture and a Method for Reducing It: An Eight-Country "Explanations of Unemployment Scale" Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0013164413502669-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84891510016en_US
dc.authorscopusid55782377200-
dc.authorscopusid6507228161-
dc.authorscopusid55982897000-
dc.authorscopusid16202345800-
dc.authorscopusid55983089700-
dc.authorscopusid6603824147-
dc.authorscopusid36170415800-
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.endpage96en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept02.04. Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2766.pdf
  Restricted Access
208.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

66
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.