Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3704
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSorkun, Metehan Feridun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T15:02:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T15:02:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1477-5360-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2016.081278-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3704-
dc.description.abstractThis research investigates whether there is any relationship between the levels of product modularity (PM) and organisational modularity (OM). It additionally explores the implications of this relationship on inventory performance. The proposition, mirroring hypothesis, establishes the positive relationship between PM and OM. However, many studies oppose to the mirroring hypothesis by revealing various contingent factors. The one, even if not being uncovered yet, is an operational factor. High inventory performance requires the pair 'modular product - supplier integration', indicating a negative relationship between PM and OM at across-firm level. This research sheds light on this controversy based on the data collected by Turkish manufacturing firms. The results show the negative correlation between PM and OM for the first time. Hence, this research additionally uncovers (i) the effects of integral products on the supplier integration level, and (ii) the counter-effects of supplier integration on the PM level. Copyright © 2016 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInderscience Publishersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Integrated Supply Managementen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBuyer-supplier relationshipen_US
dc.subjectInventory managementen_US
dc.subjectMirroring hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectNew product developmenten_US
dc.subjectOMen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational modularityen_US
dc.subjectPMen_US
dc.subjectProduct modularityen_US
dc.subjectSupply chainen_US
dc.subjectVertical integrationen_US
dc.titleContrary evidence: Product modularity and supplier integrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJISM.2016.081278-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85008646190en_US
dc.authorscopusid57192677518-
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue3.Nisen_US
dc.identifier.startpage283en_US
dc.identifier.endpage308en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept03.02. Business Administration-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2787.pdf
  Restricted Access
655.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

90
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.