Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTugdar E.E.-
dc.contributor.authorAl, Serhun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T15:03:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T15:03:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn9780429827662-
dc.identifier.isbn9781138328815-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429448423-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/3803-
dc.description.abstractTraditionally and historically, modern Turkey has always been against the idea of an independent Kurdistan in northern Iraq due to a fear of a spillover effect among Turkey’s own Kurdish population. However, after the rise of the Justice and Development Party (AKP, in Turkish) as a hegemonic power in after 2002, the relations between Ankara and Erbil have been significantly transformed as KRG has economically and politically become Turkey’s key strategic partner in the region. This chapter analyzes the ebb and flow in Turkey’s contemporary relationship with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq within the context of the September 2017 Kurdish independence referendum, in particular, and the idea of an independent Kurdistan, in general. We argue that Turkey’s evolving relationship with the KRG under the rule of AKP depends on the domestic balance of power in Turkish politics, on the one hand, and the regional security context, on the other. Two key factors come along within this framework: 1) the decline of AKP’s capacity to politically survive by itself in turbulent domestic politics and thus reliance on Turkish nationalists’ support; 2) the breakout of Syria’s civil war, the emergence of the Islamic State and the rise of pan-Kurdish nationalism across Iran, Turkey, Syria and Iraq. If the region was more promising in terms of stability and if the AKP government was not uneasy about its own political survival in Turkey, KRG’s independence move may not have led to such aggressive nationalist reaction by Ankara. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Alex Danilovich; individual chapters, the contributors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFederalism, Secession, and International Recognition Regime: Iraqi Kurdistanen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIraqi kurdistan independence aspirations and the neo-ottomanist turkishen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9780429448423-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059359637en_US
dc.authorscopusid55672457000-
dc.identifier.startpage127en_US
dc.identifier.endpage145en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept03.06. Political Science and International Relations-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
3803.pdf
  Restricted Access
346.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 25, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.