Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5206
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKabak, Kamil Erkan-
dc.contributor.authorHinckeldeyn, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorDekkers, Rob-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-30T11:20:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-30T11:20:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1747-7778-
dc.identifier.issn1747-7786-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2024.2311380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5206-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the extent to which simulation modelling has been employed beyond positivism, particularly under post-positivist and design-science-oriented paradigms, for theory building in operations management. Our study demonstrates that existing literature reviews have neglected the aspect of theory building and the generation of technological rules from a design-science perspective. A systematic literature review appraises 53 studies, published between 1976 and 2019, revealed that classical positivist approaches predominate (40 of 53 studies), followed by directive positivist (6), classical post-positivist (5), and participatory post-positivist (2) paradigms. The review highlights the potential of simulation modelling for theory building in operations management from both positivist and post-positivist perspectives. However, the dominance of positivist approaches suggests a lack of engagement with practical implementation and comparative studies. The findings advocate for greater external validation and practitioner involvement, and integrated and extended checklists for simulation studies are proposed to guide future research in this area.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEarly Career Researchers Programme of the International Foundation of Production Research; Adam Smith Business Schoolen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge the support of the Early Career Researchers Programme of the International Foundation of Production Research. Also, the Adam Smith Business School has arranged financial support for this study; specifically, we thank Ian Docherty for this. Finally, we would like to thank the anonymous reviewers from the Journal of Simulation for their comments, particularly on how research paradigms and simulation techniques may be related.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francıs Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Simulationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOperations managementen_US
dc.subjectpositivismen_US
dc.subjectpost-positivismen_US
dc.subjectsimulation modellingen_US
dc.subjecttheoryen_US
dc.subjectManufacturing Systemsen_US
dc.subjectDesign Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMaintenanceen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectAllocationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectDynamicsen_US
dc.subjectModelsen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.titleA systematic literature review into simulation for building operations management theory: reaching beyond positivism?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle; Early Accessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17477778.2024.2311380-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186888575en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authorscopusid24587842500-
dc.authorscopusid36835612300-
dc.authorscopusid6701456806-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001176278200001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle; Early Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept05.09. Industrial Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
5206.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 25, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Sep 25, 2024

Page view(s)

104
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.