Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5476
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSönmez, E.-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, M.E.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T15:14:07Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-25T15:14:07Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn8755-2930-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241262753-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5476-
dc.description.abstractThe February 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye caused widespread devastation and fatalities, highlighting the critical contrast in the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings with moment-resistant frames and those with structural walls. This study employs analyses of nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems using selected accelerograms from the earthquakes to evaluate the behavior of these structural systems. Three SDOF systems representing flexible and stiffer frame buildings, alongside RC wall buildings, were examined. The results highlighted the susceptibility of frame buildings to severe damage and collapse compared with the excellent performance of RC wall buildings. Moreover, the study emphasizes a shift of design focus from life safety to functional recovery. It also identifies potential scenarios regarding consecutive earthquake effects. Overall, the findings advocate adequately designed RC wall buildings for enhanced seismic performance and immediate occupation following major earthquakes. © The Author(s) 2024.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarthquake Spectraen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectaftershocken_US
dc.subjectdamage indexen_US
dc.subjectdriften_US
dc.subjectfunctional recoveryen_US
dc.subjectpost-earthquakeen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concrete framesen_US
dc.subjectreinforced concrete wall buildingsen_US
dc.subjectseismic behavioren_US
dc.subjectshear wallen_US
dc.subjecttunnel-formen_US
dc.subjectDamage detectionen_US
dc.subjectDegrees of freedom (mechanics)en_US
dc.subjectReinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectSeismic wavesen_US
dc.subjectShear wallsen_US
dc.subjectAftershocken_US
dc.subjectDamage indexen_US
dc.subjectDriften_US
dc.subjectFunctional recoveryen_US
dc.subjectPost-earthquakeen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concrete framesen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concrete wallen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concrete wall buildingen_US
dc.subjectSeismic behaviouren_US
dc.subjectTunnel formen_US
dc.subjectEarthquakesen_US
dc.titleFrame buildings are not an answer for earthquakes: The case of the February 2023 earthquakes in Türkiyeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/87552930241262753-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200250733en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authorscopusid57221782185-
dc.authorscopusid55586976500-
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.