Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/6346
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYurt, Canberk-
dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Deniz-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T16:58:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-25T16:58:21Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2337-5795-
dc.identifier.issn2338-5480-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5614/j.vad.2025.17.1.2-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/6346-
dc.description.abstractThe ecological crisis corrupts natural cycles, damages networks of organisms, and disrupts the ecosystem equilibrium. In response to the ecological crisis, the concept of circularity proposes reformative actions. However, these actions are insufficient to reverse the crisis and achieve ecological integrity because they are non-holistic and based on human concerns and priorities. A more inclusive and integrative mindset is necessary for better-functioning circular processes. In this regard, this research presents a theoretical framework for an alternative circular design model-Toroidality-which is driven by collective knowledge and participatory action. Toroidality functions through the integrative capacity of collective knowledge and collaboration among human and non-human stakeholders in the ecosystem. Based on the intertwined cycles of collective knowledge and collective value-creation, Toroidality becomes a self-feeding circular design model. Through its four-phased circular design processes, Toroidality claims to generate solutions that have regenerative capacities. This article clarifies the conceptual background, theoretical framework and complementary notions to present the fundamentals of Toroidality. After this initial explanatory article, the dynamics of the phases and interactions among the stakeholders are aimed to be explored and reported in the following research, through a real-life case study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherItb Journal Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Visual Art and Designen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnthropocentrismen_US
dc.subjectCircular Designen_US
dc.subjectCollective Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectDesign Modelen_US
dc.subjectEcocentrismen_US
dc.subjectEcological Integrityen_US
dc.subjectInterobjectivityen_US
dc.subjectParticipatory Action Researchen_US
dc.titleParticipatory Action for and Through Ecological Integrity: Toroidality as a Circular Design Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5614/j.vad.2025.17.1.2-
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage27en_US
dc.identifier.endpage48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001544327100001-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept06.03. Industrial Design-
Appears in Collections:WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

2
checked on Sep 1, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.