Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Abusharekh, Mohammed"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    The Influence of Left Ventricular Pacing Polarity on Ventricular Repolarization Parameters in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Its Clinical Reflections on Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
    (2021) Abusharekh, Mohammed; Alak, Çetin; Durukan, Ahmet Barış; Yılmaz, Akar; Ertürk, Emre; Özcan, Emin Evren
    Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of the left ventricular (LV) pacing polarities on ventricular repolarization patterns and to examine novel parameters taking depolarization into account. Patients and methods: This prospective study included a total of 54 patients (39 males, 15 females; mean age: 65.2±11.6 years; range, 40 to 89 years) with successful cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar LV leads between January 2014 and February 2017. The patients were divided into two groups as the true bipolar group (n=25) and the unipolar/extended bipolar group (n=29). Ventricular repolarization parameters and novel markers, i.e., TpTe/QRS, Tpec/QRS, TpTe/(QRS ¥ QTc) and Tpec/(QRS ¥ QTc), were measured before implantation within 48 h following the procedure and at six months. Evaluation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was performed using device records during follow-up. Results: The median follow-up was 17.7 (range, 12.6 to 31.2) months. The mean ejection fraction was 23.3±5.5% in the bipolar group and 23.62±6.24% in the unipolar/extended bipolar group. Bipolar LV pacing was associated with higher Tpec/QTc values (acute, bipolar vs. unipolar, +0.011 vs. -0.0008, p=0.019; long-term, bipolar vs. unipolar, +0.005 vs. - 0.015, p=0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of other repolarization parameters. Bipolar pacing was associated with significantly higher novel markers values and more frequent sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects Tpec/QTc, but not the other ventricular repolarization parameters. Novel arrhythmia predictors, i.e., TpTe/QRS, Tpec/QRS, TpTe/(QRS x QTc), and Tpec/(QRS x QTc), are more influenced in bipolar pacing associated with more frequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback