Browsing by Author "Celik, Buket"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Citation - WoS: 28
Citation - Scopus: 30
The Effect of Selected Risk Factors on Perioperative Pressure Injury Development
(Wiley, 2019) Celik, Buket; Karayurt, Ozgul; Ogce, Filiz
Patients undergoing operative and other invasive procedures are at high risk for developing pressure injuries. This study aimed to determine the incidence of perioperative pressure injuries in patients who underwent procedures lasting two hours or more in Turkey and the risk factors that affect the development of pressure injuries. Data were collected during the perioperative period. The incidence of perioperative pressure injuries was 40.4%. The results of univariate logistic regression analysis showed that intraoperative vasopressor use, skin turgor, and diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 60 mm Hg were significantly related to the development of pressure injuries. There was no significant difference between patients who developed pressure injuries and patients who did not when comparing their preoperative Braden Scale scores. Perioperative nurses should assess each patient for pressure injury risk and perform interventions to prevent pressure injuries during each stage of the patient's perioperative course.
A New Intervention To Increase Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Investigation of Effect of Systemchange Intervention
(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2022) Ordin, Yaprak Sarigol; Yildiz, Serkan; Kankaya, Eda Ayten; Celik, Buket; Ertan, Nermin; Karayurt, Ozgul; Russell, Cynthia L.
[Abstract Not Available]
Citation - WoS: 2
Citation - Scopus: 2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey
(Baycinar Medical Publ-Baycinar Tibbi Yayincilik, 2021) Deveci, Zeynep; Karayury, Ozgul; Celik, Buket; Eyigor, Sibel
Objectives: This study aims to adapt the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey- Arm (LSIDS-Arm) into Turkish and to test its validity and reliability. Patients and methods: Between September 2017 and July 2018, this descriptive, methodological study included a total of 186 women (mean age: 55.4 +/- 10.2 years; range, 20 to 80 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) and followed in the lymphedema outpatient clinic. Data were collected using sociodemographic and clinical features form, LSIDS-Arm, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast Cancer Scale+4 (FACT-B+4). After the linguistic and content validity of the scale was achieved, confirmatory factor analysis and known-groups validation were utilized to test the construct validity. Reliability of the survey was tested using the Cronbach alpha and Spearman Brown coefficient, item analysis, and parallel forms reliability. Results: All patients completed the questionnaire. After achievement of linguistic and content validity, confirmatory factor analysis results were found to be higher than the accepted value. Known-groups validation revealed a significant difference in the mean scores for the intensity and distress scales between the patients with and without lymphedema. Cronbach alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.61 to 0.86. Parallel forms reliability showed a moderate, significant correlation between subscales of the intensity and distress scales of the survey and the subscales of FACT-B+4. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the survey is valid and reliable and can be used to evaluate symptoms, severity of symptoms, and distress caused by BCRL symptoms in the Turkish women.