Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Lia, L."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 5
    Citation - Scopus: 7
    Application of Three-Dimensional Cfd Model To Determination of the Capacity of Existing Tyrolean Intake
    (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), 2024) Bor Türkben, Aslı; Szabo-Meszaros, M.; Vereide, K.; Lia, L.
    CFD models of intakes in high-head hydropower systems are rare due to the lack of geometric data and cost of modeling. This study tests two different types of software to see how modeling can be performed in a cost-effective way with scarce input data and still have sufficient accuracy. The volume of fluid (VoF) model simulations are conducted using both ANSYS Fluent and OpenFOAM. The geometry is modelled from Google Earth satellite images, drone scanning data, and design drawings from the construction period and supported by field observations for extra quality control. From the model, both capacity parameters and flow pattern are calculated. For capacity, the  (Formula presented.)  factor is calculated and compared with the literature. The simulations are conducted for a Tyrolean weir with rectangular bars (flat steel) in the rack. Simulated flow patterns through the rack with ANSYS Fluent and OpenFOAM are compared. OpenFOAM simulations yielded 15% to 20% higher water levels compared to the VOF model applied in Ansys Fluent. Also, when the flow rate was high, the water capture capacity calculated with ANSYS Fluent was 10% higher than that obtained with OpenFOAM. However, considering the total simulation times, modeling with OpenFOAM offered approximately 11% faster results. © 2024 by the authors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Hydraulic Scale Modeling of Pressurized Sediment Laden Flow
    (MDPI, 2025) Gebrelibanos, K.G.; Vereide, K.; Weldemariam, S.A.; Bor, Aslı; Tesfay, A.H.; Lia, L.
    In hydropower tunnel systems, unlined pressurized tunnels in competent rock are commonly used for cost-effective construction. Incorporating pressurized sand traps at the downstream end of these tunnels can increase plant capacity and improve energy efficiency. The present work focuses on optimizing the performance of existing pressurized sand traps. Hydraulic scale models were developed and tested at the Hydraulic Laboratory of NTNU, Within the 960 MW Tonstad Hydropower Plant in southern Norway as a case study. This study compares 1:1 velocity/sediment scaling with Froude scaling through physical experiments, analyzing velocity profiles via Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and sediment trap efficiency. Results show that Froude scaling, combined with geometric sediment scaling, provides superior accuracy in trap efficiency scaling across varying factors. However, in many practical hydropower applications, the large scaling factor required for laboratory models results in very small model sediments, leading to cohesion limitations. In such cases, Froude scaling may not be feasible. The 1:1 scaling method provides a conservative alternative. Hence, for practical applications, 1:1 scaling may be more cost-effective and sufficient for designing pressurized sand traps. This study emphasizes the importance of accounting for unscaled parameters and flow phenomena in hydraulic model design. © 2025 by the authors.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback