Browsing by Author "Seval-Celik, Yasemin"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Effects of Varenicline as an Adjunct to Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Acute Nerve Injury(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2026-02) Ozturk, Volga; Rusen, Yasemen Adali; Ertener, Ozge; Seval-Celik, Yasemin; Dastan, Ali Engin; Ozgenc, Serhat; Baris, ElifIntroduction: Acute nerve injury (ANI) leads to significant neuropathic pain and functional impairment. Current treatments, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like meloxicam, provide symptomatic relief but have limited neuroregenerative effects. Varenicline, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist, has demonstrated neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. Aim: This study evaluates the effects of varenicline as an add-on therapy to meloxicam in a rat model of ANI. Methods: Eighteen female Wistar rats were randomized into four groups: Control (CONT), Sham (SHAM), Acute Nerve Injury + Meloxicam (ANI+Melox), and Acute Nerve Injury + Meloxicam + Varenicline (ANI+Melox+VAR). Varenicline (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered alongside meloxicam (2 mg/kg, s.c.). Functional recovery, histopathological changes, and biochemical markers, including prostaglandins (PGE2, PGI2), substance P, IL-6, levels, were assessed after 30 days. Results: Varenicline and meloxicam co-treatment significantly reduced inflammatory and pain biomarkers including prostaglandins, interleukin-6 and substance P, compared to meloxicam alone. Histopathological evaluation revealed enhanced Schwann cell proliferation, reduced fibrosis, and increased Bands of B & uuml;ngner formation, suggesting nerve regeneration. Conclusion: Varenicline, as an adjunct to meloxicam, enhances neuroprotection, reduces inflammation, and promotes histological and biochemical indicators of regeneration in rats with acute sciatic nerve injury. Future studies should explore its long-term effects and potential as a monotherapy for peripheral nerve injuries.Article Multidisciplinary Case-Based Small Group Discussions To Integrate Basic Medical Sciences With Clinical Situations(Walter De Gruyter Gmbh, 2020-09-18) Şemin, Makbule İlgi; Ersil Soysal, Dilek; Seval Çelik, Yasemin; Hayran, Murvet; Demir, Ayse Banu; Ozkaya, Ali Burak; İnan, Sevinç; Akdoğan, Gül; Semin, Ilgi; Soysal, Dilek Ersil; Seval-Celik, Yasemin; Güner, Gül AkdoganObjectives Integration of the basic medical sciences with clinical medicine motivates medical students by showing how the fundamental concepts they have learned will come into their future practice. In this context, we created clinical integration sessions (CIS) in our first-year medical curriculum. Methods The instructors of different disciplines wrote the clinical scenarios together. The scenarios were discussed in five sessions with 39 first-year students. The first session's scenario consisted of four brief anemia cases. The next four sessions included a single case, according to the feedback of the students. Students formed groups of 7-8 participants. In the first 2 h, the scenarios were discussed in the groups and questions were answered by the students. In the third hour, the instructors answered the questions together with the students. After the first CIS, written feedback obtained from the students via a survey. Results The survey provided positive feedback on the benefits of active learning within small group discussions, and most of the students thought that their background was sufficient to solve the cases, with some literature search. Conclusion The scenarios, which provide multidisciplinary integration of basic medical sciences and clinical medicine, can be useful educational materials.

