Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Tok, Tugba"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    Human-Thing Relations in Design: a Framework Based on Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory
    (Middle East Technical Univ, 2022) Aktas, Bilge Merve; Tok, Tugba; Gurtekin, Betul; Kaygan, Harun; Dilek, Ozgun; Ozcelik, Aysegul; Akin, Fazil; Büyükkeçeci̇, Elif
    Starting with the earlier work of Don Ihde, postphenomenological studies in philosophy of technology have been documenting the many ways in which technologies shape human beings' relationship to the world. More recently, Material Engagement Theory (MET), originating from cognitive archaeology, offers descriptions of how human thinking and capacities have been shaped through creative material engagements with the world. Based on a recent collaboration by Ihde and Malafouris (2018), this study applies the joint framework of postphenomenology and MET to design research in light of the rising interest in design literature into relational ontologies and embodied practices. The study is built on data from seven case studies of practices in creative engagement with materials and tools, three out of which are reviewed in depth, namely: felt making, make-up, studio camera operation. The cases are analyzed through the joint theoretical lens to identify and describe the human-thing relations as observed in design. We describe such relations as creative and exploratory, materially and socially relational, reciprocally mediated, situated, embodied, and skilled. Our emphasis is on the first three of these six characteristics, emphasizing relationality, reciprocal mediation, and creativity in engagement, as significant contributions of the joint framework to understanding design, making and use in design research. Our conclusion includes a discussion of future research opportunities for studies based on the joint framework.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback