Eğrilmez, Murat

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/6659
Name Variants
Eğrilmez M.
Egrilmez, Murat
Egrilmez, M
Job Title
Email Address
murat.egrilmez@ieu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
09.04. Surgical Sciences
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0001-7813-0241
Scopus Author ID
6506070530
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
095384EF311C46FF
Google Scholar ID
QavC6uAAAAAJ
WoS Researcher ID
AGW-3046-2022

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
Documents

6

Citations

119

h-index

4

Go to Scopus profile
Documents

7

Citations

97

Go to WoS profile
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

0/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
The Journal of International Advanced Otology1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20241
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Can Video Head Impulse Testing Be Used To Estimate the Involved Canal in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
    (Aves, 2024) Uslu, Mustafa; Egrilmez, Murat; Miman, Murat Cem
    BACKGROUND: There may be confusion about which canal is involved in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), especially with those that have subtle findings. The study aimed to determine if video head impulse testing may be used in such patients as a diagnostic tool. Symptom scoring and treatment efficiency in BPPV are essential parts of the process. Therefore, inventories like "Dizziness Handicap Inventory" may be useful in this regard. METHODS: Patients with posterior and lateral canal BPPV were included. Video head impulse testing was performed prior to treatment and 1 week after treatment. Vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) gains were noted and compared to the opposite side. The presence of correction saccades was noted as well. Also, pretreatment and posttreatment Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were diagnosed with posterior canal BPPV, and sixteen were with horizontal canal BPPV. In patients with posterior canal BPPV, there was no difference between the involved canal VOR gains and the other canals on the same side (P =.639). The involved horizontal canal did not differ from the opposite horizontal canal. Patients with lateral canal BPPV show more significant improvement after treatment compared to patients with posterior canal BPPV. CONCLUSION: Video head impulse testing may not be used to estimate the involved canal in BPPV; however, it may be used to evaluate the efficiency of the treatment, especially in the lateral canal.