Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2345
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorBiçen, Ahmet Çağdaş-
dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Mustafa-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:38:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:38:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1413-7852-
dc.identifier.issn1809-4406-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220223001e240181-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2345-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Humerus shaft fractures may be treated conservatively or surgically. In 2.5% to 13% of cases, nonunion is observed, and it leads to severe pain and morbidity. Plate osteosynthesis has become popular in the treatment of nonunion of the humeral shaft. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with humerus shaft nonunion whom we treated with single- or double-plate fixation. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients diagnosed with aseptic humeral shaft nonunion and treated with plate fixation were included in the study. Patients were evaluated according to the number of plates (single vs. double plates). The two groups were subjected to statistical evaluation according to their clinical and radiographical results. Results: The average age of the patients was 53 years (range: 1-86); 28 (52.8%) were female and 25 (47.2%) were male. The union rate was 90.32% for single plate and 90.91% for double plate fixation. There was no statistically significant difference between single and double plates in the clinical and radiographical results (union time, union rate, Q-DASH score) (p > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between age and union times / Q-DASH scores according to the Spearman correlation test (p < 0.05). Transient radial nerve neuropraxia developed in 2 patients and 1 patient suffered from an infection that was treated with debridement and antibiotic therapy. Conclusion: In our study, similar good results were obtained with single and double plates. In treatment of humeral shaft nonunions, a second plate is not needed if enough stability is provided with single plate fixation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAtha Comunicacao & Editoraen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Ortopedıca Brasıleıraen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHumerusen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectDiaphysisen_US
dc.subjectOperative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectSurgical-Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectCompression Plateen_US
dc.subjectFracturesen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectUnionen_US
dc.subjectGraften_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF SINGLE- AND DOUBLE-PLATE FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN THE TREATMENT OF NONUNIONS OF THE HUMERAL SHAFTen_US
dc.title.alternativeCOMPARAÇÃO DE TÉCNICAS DE FIXAÇÃO DE PLACA SIMPLES E DUPLA NO TRATAMENTO DE PSEUDOARTROSE DO CORPO DO ÚMEROen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1413-785220223001e240181-
dc.identifier.pmid35431621en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126370358en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridAkdemir, Mehmet/0000-0001-9638-4907-
dc.authorwosidAkdemir, Mehmet/AAG-6355-2019-
dc.authorwosidBiçen, Çağdaş/ABC-1232-2020-
dc.authorscopusid42660960000-
dc.authorscopusid55274261700-
dc.authorscopusid7103273177-
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000752525100016en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept09.04. Surgical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2345.pdf369.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

48
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.