A Comparison of Turkish-English Bilinguals' Processing of Emotion Words in Their Two Languages
Loading...
Files
Date
2017
Authors
Mergen, Filiz
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Hacettepe Univ, Elt Dept
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
There is a great deal of evidence showing that, in monolinguals, various emotional stimuli are processed by the brain in different ways. This view has found considerable support from studies conducted with verbal stimuli. In bilinguals, on the other hand, emotional processing is more complex, and is thought to be influenced mainly by two factors; age of language acquisition and proficiency. In this study, participants were forty-eight simultaneous / early bilinguals, who acquired both languages from birth, and have high proficiency in both. A lexical decision task, i.e., distinguishing real words from non-words, was used to gain insight into to how the participants processed visually presented emotion words in Turkish and English. Reaction times and accuracy were recorded via SuperLab software program and were statistically analyzed. Shorter response times and higher accuracy rates were found for real words compared to non-words in both languages. Also, shorter response times were found for positive compared to negative and neutral words in both languages. An analysis of the accuracy rates revealed no statistically significant differences among Turkish emotion words, whereas, for English, accuracy rates were higher for positive words when compared to negative and neutral words. These results have been interpreted in the light of psycholinguistic models of lexical processing (C) 2017 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL).
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Bilingualism, lexical processing, emotion words, lateralization, Lexical Decision, Negative Words, Memory, 2nd-Language, Erp, Potentials, Speakers, Fmri, 1st, Bilingualism;lexical processing;emotion words;lateralization
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
5
Source
Eurasıan Journal of Applıed Lınguıstıcs
Volume
3
Issue
2
Start Page
89
End Page
98
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 15
Google Scholar™


