Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2981
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAltunok, Taner-
dc.contributor.authorÖzpeynirci, Özgür-
dc.contributor.authorKazancoglu, Yigit-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Recai-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:52:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:52:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1302-597X-
dc.identifier.issn2528-8911-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/2981-
dc.description.abstractProblem Statement: The educational recourses available for postgraduate education are limited compared with the resources for undergraduate education. An academic advisor is required for each graduate student. The academic staff allocates an important portion of his/her time for graduate studies of his/her students. Since the number of academic staff is limited, the number of graduate students should be limited, too. While a large number of students may attend an undergraduate course, this may not be possible for some graduate courses, which are designed especially for small student groups. Hence, the selection of postgraduate students is an important problem. The postgraduate student selection problem can be defined as selecting a subset of students from the applicants for a postgraduate program. Naturally, this problem is a multi-criteria decision-making problem since each applicant has several attributes and these attributes should be considered simultaneously during the selection process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of different multi criteria decision-making methods developed for ranking alternatives for the postgraduate student selection problem. The best method will also be used in the student selection process for the Defense Sciences Institute of Turkish Military Academy. Methods: This paper discusses three multi-criteria decision making methods developed for ranking alternatives, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighted Product (WP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A performance measure is defined and the performance values of the methods are compared using real data gathered from the graduates of Defense Sciences Institute of Turkish Military Academy for illustration purposes. Findings and Results: According to the findings, AHP is the best of the three competitors. The ranking obtained by AHP is quite similar to the ranking of students with respect to their cumulative grade point average (CGPA) after their graduation from the program. Conclusions and Recommendations: Considering graduate student selection problem as a multicriteria decision-making problem is very important and enables universities to enroll graduate students with important attributes and a variety of strengths. This paper compares the performance of different multicriteria decision-making methods on graduate student selection problem using a single performance measure. A further study can be making such a comparison with multiple performance measures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAni Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofEurasıan Journal of Educatıonal Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMulticriteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectgraduate student selectionen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectModified Topsisen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Postgraduate Student Selectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957593455en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridÖzpeynirci, Özgür/0000-0002-3695-6587-
dc.authoridKazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X-
dc.authoridKazancoglu, Yigit/0000-0001-9199-671X-
dc.authoridALTUNOK, TANER/0000-0002-7084-5178-
dc.authorwosidÖzpeynirci, Özgür/A-2796-2009-
dc.authorwosidKazancoglu, Yigit/E-7705-2015-
dc.authorwosidKazancoglu, Yigit/AAT-5676-2021-
dc.authorwosidALTUNOK, TANER/AAL-8236-2020-
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue40en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000285629600001en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid108924en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept03.05. Logistics Management-
crisitem.author.dept03.02. Business Administration-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2132.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

142
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.