Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/4697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEmirdar, Volkan-
dc.contributor.authorAcet, Ferruh-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T20:56:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-19T20:56:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1682-024X-
dc.identifier.issn1681-715X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.3.7003-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/4697-
dc.description.abstractBackground & Objective: Y chromosome abnormalities are common in male patients with severe oligo-azoospermia. In studies with karyotype analysis and cytogenetic methods, the importance of the Y chromosome in spermatogenesis has been well understood. Deletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) localized at the distal end of the Y chromosome adversely affect the spermatogenesis process. Our objective was to determine the frequency of AZF microdeletion in azoospermia patients who underwent microTESE.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 806 azoospermic men attending the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Center for infertility treatment between 2010 and 2022 were included. AZF deletion screening was conducted in all patients included in the study. Azoospermic patients with and without Y microdeletion were matched with the female's age, cause of infertility, number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes produced and compared. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Pregnancy rate (PR) and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) were secondary outcomes.Results: We detected Y microdeletion in 55 (6.82%) of 806 infertile azoospermic men and 35 of them included in the study. Although the required gonadotropin dose and the total number of retrieved oocytes were similar, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were found to be significantly lower in the microdeletion patient group (21.6% vs. 43%, p<0.05; and 18.9% vs. 36%, p<0.05, respectively).Conclusions: Poor sperm quality in AZF microdeletion patients complicates the selection of appropriate sperm for ICSI. Therefore, it leads to a decrease in embryonic development, fertilization and pregnancy results. In order to select the best sperm for the use in ICSI procedure in this patient population, intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) method can be preferred to improve the cycle outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherProfessional Medical Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPakistan Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAzoospermiaen_US
dc.subjectICSIen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectInfertilityen_US
dc.subjectMicrodeletionen_US
dc.subjectY-Chromosomeen_US
dc.subjectMale-Infertilityen_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.subjectGuidelinesen_US
dc.subjectExtractionen_US
dc.titleThe effect of azoospermia factor microdeletions on intracytoplasmic sperm injection results in azoospermia patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12669/pjms.39.3.7003-
dc.identifier.pmid37250564en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150690944en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridemirdar, volkan/0000-0003-4973-2563-
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage672en_US
dc.identifier.endpage676en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000989167300010en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept09.04. Surgical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
4697.pdf323.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Oct 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

74
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.