Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5039
Title: | Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis | Authors: | Soo, R.A. Cho, B.C. Kim, J.-H. Ahn, M.-J. Lee, K.H. Zimina, A. Orlov, S. Hana Lee Arslan, Çağatay |
Keywords: | CNS Lazertinib NSCLC TKI gefitinib lazertinib EGFR protein, human epidermal growth factor receptor gefitinib lazertinib protein kinase inhibitor quinazoline derivative adult advanced cancer aged cancer control cancer radiotherapy cancer screening cancer survival central nervous system metastasis clinical trial protocol Conference Paper controlled study cumulative incidence double blind procedure drug efficacy drug safety drug tolerability female gene mutation human human tissue major clinical study male neuroimaging non small cell lung cancer open study outcome assessment overall response rate phase 3 clinical trial progression free survival randomized controlled trial treatment duration treatment response central nervous system genetics lung tumor mutation Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Central Nervous System ErbB Receptors Gefitinib Humans Lung Neoplasms Mutation Protein Kinase Inhibitors Quinazolines |
Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. | Abstract: | Introduction: Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with EGFR–mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response. Results: Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8–28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3–NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8–NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population. Conclusions: In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses. © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.017 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5039 |
ISSN: | 1556-0864 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Nov 20, 2024
Page view(s)
78
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
24
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.