Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5039
Title: Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis
Authors: Soo, R.A.
Cho, B.C.
Kim, J.-H.
Ahn, M.-J.
Lee, K.H.
Zimina, A.
Orlov, S.
Hana Lee
Arslan, Çağatay
Keywords: CNS
Lazertinib
NSCLC
TKI
gefitinib
lazertinib
EGFR protein, human
epidermal growth factor receptor
gefitinib
lazertinib
protein kinase inhibitor
quinazoline derivative
adult
advanced cancer
aged
cancer control
cancer radiotherapy
cancer screening
cancer survival
central nervous system metastasis
clinical trial protocol
Conference Paper
controlled study
cumulative incidence
double blind procedure
drug efficacy
drug safety
drug tolerability
female
gene mutation
human
human tissue
major clinical study
male
neuroimaging
non small cell lung cancer
open study
outcome assessment
overall response rate
phase 3 clinical trial
progression free survival
randomized controlled trial
treatment duration
treatment response
central nervous system
genetics
lung tumor
mutation
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Central Nervous System
ErbB Receptors
Gefitinib
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Quinazolines
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
Abstract: Introduction: Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with EGFR–mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response. Results: Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8–28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3–NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8–NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population. Conclusions: In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses. © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.017
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5039
ISSN: 1556-0864
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
5039.pdf416.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.