Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5157
Title: | Association of ratios of monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with atherosclerotic plaque type on coronary computed tomography | Authors: | Okan, Taha Topaloğlu, Caner |
Keywords: | coronary artery disease coronary computed tomography angiography monocyte/HDL-C ratio neutrophil/HDL-C ratio atherosclerosis Hdl-C Ratio Vulnerable Plaque Artery Disease Inflammation Progression Mortality Therapy Statin Term |
Publisher: | Clinics Cardive Publ Pty Ltd | Abstract: | Objectives: The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) and neutrophil/HDL-C ratio (NHR) are markers for inflammation and dyslipidaemia, which are important factors in atherosclerosis. Studies have linked MHR and NHR to the prediction, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease. However, no study has explored their connection to plaque stability, specifically its calcific or soft/mixed content. Methods: Monocyte, neutrophil and HDL-C levels were examined in 99 patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) between January and August 2023. They were divided into three groups: a group of 42 healthy individuals (group 0) with no coronary artery plaque and an Agatson score of 0, an unstable plaque group (group 1) with 31 patients displaying mixed and/or soft plaque on CTA, and a stable plaque group (group 2) with 26 patients showing only calcific plaque. Results: White blood cell (WBC), monocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: WBC = 6.31 +/- 0.97 x 103cells/ mu l, monocytes = 0.40 +/- 0.09 x 10' cells/mu l, neutrophils = 3.32 +/- 0.81 x 10(3) cells/mu l; and group 1: WBC = 7.61 +/- 1.95 x 10(3) cells/mu l, monocytes = 0.50 +/- 0.11 x 10(3) cells/mu l, neutrophils = 4.19 +/- 1.36 10(3) cells/mu l; p < 0.05). MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: MHR = 0.0079 +/- 0.0029, NHR = 0.063 +/- 0.023 and group 1: MHR = 0.0102 +/- 0.003, NHR = 0.085 +/- 0.036, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The significant differences in MHR and NHR between the three groups were due to the differences between groups 0 and 1. MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-064 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5157 |
ISSN: | 1995-1892 1680-0745 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
5157.pdf Restricted Access | 960.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on Nov 20, 2024
Page view(s)
132
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Download(s)
4
checked on Nov 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.