Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5157
Title: Association of ratios of monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with atherosclerotic plaque type on coronary computed tomography
Authors: Okan, Taha
Topaloğlu, Caner
Keywords: coronary artery disease
coronary computed tomography angiography
monocyte/HDL-C ratio
neutrophil/HDL-C ratio
atherosclerosis
Hdl-C Ratio
Vulnerable Plaque
Artery
Disease
Inflammation
Progression
Mortality
Therapy
Statin
Term
Publisher: Clinics Cardive Publ Pty Ltd
Abstract: Objectives: The monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) and neutrophil/HDL-C ratio (NHR) are markers for inflammation and dyslipidaemia, which are important factors in atherosclerosis. Studies have linked MHR and NHR to the prediction, severity and prognosis of coronary artery disease. However, no study has explored their connection to plaque stability, specifically its calcific or soft/mixed content. Methods: Monocyte, neutrophil and HDL-C levels were examined in 99 patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) between January and August 2023. They were divided into three groups: a group of 42 healthy individuals (group 0) with no coronary artery plaque and an Agatson score of 0, an unstable plaque group (group 1) with 31 patients displaying mixed and/or soft plaque on CTA, and a stable plaque group (group 2) with 26 patients showing only calcific plaque. Results: White blood cell (WBC), monocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: WBC = 6.31 +/- 0.97 x 103cells/ mu l, monocytes = 0.40 +/- 0.09 x 10' cells/mu l, neutrophils = 3.32 +/- 0.81 x 10(3) cells/mu l; and group 1: WBC = 7.61 +/- 1.95 x 10(3) cells/mu l, monocytes = 0.50 +/- 0.11 x 10(3) cells/mu l, neutrophils = 4.19 +/- 1.36 10(3) cells/mu l; p < 0.05). MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 0 patients (group 0: MHR = 0.0079 +/- 0.0029, NHR = 0.063 +/- 0.023 and group 1: MHR = 0.0102 +/- 0.003, NHR = 0.085 +/- 0.036, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The significant differences in MHR and NHR between the three groups were due to the differences between groups 0 and 1. MHR and NHR were significantly higher in group 1 patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2.
URI: https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2023-064
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5157
ISSN: 1995-1892
1680-0745
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
5157.pdf
  Restricted Access
960.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Page view(s)

132
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.