Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5549
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTopaloğlu, Caner-
dc.contributor.authorFici, Francesco-
dc.contributor.authorVan de Borne, Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorTaşkın, Uğur-
dc.contributor.authorDoğduş, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorSaygı, Serkan-
dc.contributor.authorTengiz, İstemihan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T15:17:42Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-25T15:17:42Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn0066-782X-
dc.identifier.issn1678-4170-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230604i-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5549-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with cryoablation is an alternative to radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients due to the low risk of total atrioventricular block. An increase in early-late recurrences after cryoablation is reported as an important disadvantage. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the acute procedural success and the long-term recurrence rates of patients, with AVNRT who underwent methods. Methods: 73 patients with AVNRT were included in the study: 32 with cryoablation and 41 with RF ablation. There was no statistically significant difference between acute procedural success in methods. The ablation procedure was performed by an operator experienced in arrhythmology. The choice of RF or cryoablation was made in the electrophysiology laboratory based on the material already available during the procedure. After the procedure, the patients were evaluated every 3 months for 2 years in polyclinic control. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. Results: The 2 groups of patients were homogeneous. The fluoroscopy time (p<0.001) was shorter, but atrium-his (p=0.004) and his-ventricular (p=0.015) times were longer in the cryoablation group. There was no significant difference, in terms of acute procedural success, post-procedure jump without a single echo, and presence of echo and jump. Conclusions: Cryoablation requires less fluoroscopy time and is a safe non-inferior alternative to RF ablation in patients with AVNRT. The risk of AV block is a significant problem with the use of RF energy, making it less suitable for use in young and physically active patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherArquivos Brasileiros Cardiologiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos brasileiros de cardiologiaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardiaen_US
dc.subjectCryosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectRadiofrequency Ablationen_US
dc.subjectSupraventricular Tachycardiaen_US
dc.subjectCatheteren_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectAgeen_US
dc.titleAblation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Focal Cryoablation, Compared with Radiofrequency Ablation: Single-Center Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.36660/abc.20230604i-
dc.identifier.pmid39352187en_US
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridTaskin, Ugur/0000-0002-9282-3180-
dc.authoridDOGDUS, Mustafa/0000-0002-3895-1923-
dc.authoridTengiz, Istemihan/0000-0003-1725-6451-
dc.authorwosidDogdus, Mustafa/ABA-3670-2020-
dc.identifier.volume121en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001320703400001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept09.02. Internal Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept09.02. Internal Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept09.02. Internal Sciences-
crisitem.author.dept09.02. Internal Sciences-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

8
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.