Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkan, Taha-
dc.contributor.authorDoruk, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorTopaloglu, Caner-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mehmet Birhan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-25T16:53:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-25T16:53:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2458-8938-
dc.identifier.issn2564-7288-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1463098-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1274277-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/5590-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS) and Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness (CIMT) are surrogate markers for atherosclerosis. CACS is a recognized indicator of coronary artery disease (CAD), but CIMT's role in CAD diagnosis is debated. This study aimed to assess how well CIMT and CACS predict CAD presence and severity as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Materials and Methods: In the study, 88 participants (57 CAD and 31 controls) underwent coronary angiography and CACS calculation using computerized tomography and CIMT measured according to the guidelines. Patients with CAD were classified by CACT results and further subdivided by CACS into three groups: Group I (<100), Group II (100-300), and Group III (>= 300). The relationship between CIMT and CAD groups with zero Agatston scores, as well as the control group, was also examined. Results: The CACS had 82% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting CAD, excluding CAD with 75.6% specificity. A CIMT max cut-off of >= 0.78 mm showed 76% sensitivity and 54% specificity for CAD. A CIMT max cut-off of >= 1.03 mm had 93% specificity but only 35% sensitivity, while <= 0.59 mm excluded CAD with 96% specificity but just 10% sensitivity. Patients with CIMT levels between 0.59 mm and 1.03 mm may need further testing to assess CAD risk accurately. Conclusion: The CACS is more sensitive than CIMT in predicting CAD, and CIMT is not helpful when the CACS is zero. Determining an optimal CIMT cutoff for CAD prediction is challenging, and patients with CIMT between 0.59 mm and 1.03 mm may require additional testing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDokuz Eylul Univ Inst Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCarotis intima media thicknessen_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery diseaseen_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery calcium scoreen_US
dc.subjectagatston scoreen_US
dc.subjectAtherosclerosisen_US
dc.subjectExtenten_US
dc.subjectCalcificationen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectAngiographyen_US
dc.subjectPredictoren_US
dc.subjectSeverityen_US
dc.subjectEventsen_US
dc.subjectMarkeren_US
dc.titleCarotis intima-media thickness, coronary calcium score at different stages of coronary artery diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.30621/jbachs.1463098-
dc.departmentİzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridYilmaz, Mehmet Birhan/0000-0002-8169-8628-
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Mehmet Birhan/Y-1372-2019-
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage626en_US
dc.identifier.endpage633en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001334630400013en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1274277en_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept09.02. Internal Sciences-
Appears in Collections:TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.