Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/6311
Title: | Standardizing the Definition of Each Colon Cancer Segment: Delphi Consensus on Clinical Decision-Making for Oncologic Outcomes | Other Titles: | Estandarización De La Definición De Cada Segmento De Cáncer De Colon: Consenso Delphi Sobre La Toma De Decisiones Clínicas Para Resultados Oncológicos | Authors: | Kuzu, M.A. Benlice, C. Parvaiz, A. Gorgun, E. Bertelsen, C.A. Wexner, S.D. Walter, B. |
Keywords: | Colon Cancer Segment Classification Definition Delphi Consensus Localization |
Publisher: | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Data registries lack a definitive classification system that distinguishes different locations of colon cancer from one another. OBJECTIVE: To establish an international consensus on the definition of primary colon cancer segment locations. DESIGN: Between December 2022 and June 2023, the Delphi survey study was conducted to seek opinions from relevant international experts and eventually develop a consensus definition of each colon cancer segment. SETTING: Three-round online-based Delphi survey study. INTERVENTIONS: The online survey included 17 questions. In the first 2 rounds, participating experts were asked to rank each statement on a scale of 1 (least relevant) to 9 (most relevant). Consensus statements and definitions were revised according to the results for statements obtaining a consensus score of 7 to 9. During the third round and online meeting, definitions and statements that reached a moderate or high consensus (above 4 for more than 70% of participants) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary goal of our project was focused on precisely localizing the specific segment affected by primary colon cancer rather than identifying surgical treatment or type of resection needed for a particular segment. RESULTS: The first round included 331 experts; 301 (91%) completed the second round and 295 (98%) completed the final round. Experts strongly supported the use of a “10-cm rule” to describe colon cancer sites at the flexures and anatomical landmarks for other segments. Regarding the definition of rectosigmoid cancer, experts from United States and Europe reached a high consensus that the term rectosigmoid as a colon cancer location must be abolished in contrast to experts from Asia. The description of overlapping segments of cancers achieved a consensus of 64%. LIMITATIONS: Subjective decisions are based on individual expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey, the first internationally conducted consensus study, achieved a remarkable level of consensus among a panel of global experts. Ambiguity still exists regarding overlapping lesions. See Video Abstract. © The ASCRS 2025. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003739 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14365/6311 |
ISSN: | 0012-3706 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Jul 30, 2025
Page view(s)
2
checked on Jul 28, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.